Decoding the Molecular Universe -- Workshop Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On August 9-10, 2023, a workshop was convened at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Richland, WA that brought together a group of internationally recognized experts in metabolomics, natural products discovery, chemical ecology, chemical and biological threat assessment, cheminformatics, computational chemistry, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and novel technology development. These experts were invited to assess the value and feasibility of a grand-scale project to create new technologies that would allow the identification and quantification of all small molecules, or to decode the molecular universe. The Decoding the Molecular Universe project would extend and complement the success of the Human Genome Project by developing new capabilities and technologies to measure small molecules (defined as non-protein, non-polymer molecules less than 1500 Daltons) of any origin and generated in biological systems or produced abiotically. Workshop attendees 1) explored what new understanding of biological and environmental systems could be revealed through the lens of small molecules; 2) characterized the similarities in current needs and technical challenges between each science or mission area for unambiguous and comprehensive determination of the composition and quantities of small molecules of any sample; 3) determined the extent to which technologies or methods currently exist for unambiguously and comprehensively determining the small molecule composition of any sample and in a reasonable time; and 4) identified the attributes of the ideal technology or approach for universal small molecule measurement and identification. The workshop concluded with a discussion of how a project of this scale could be undertaken, possible thrusts for the project, early proof-of-principle applications, and similar efforts upon which the project could be modeled.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".