MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388930229 · doi:10.2196/46709

Efficacy and Safety of the Natural Killer T Cell–Stimulatory Glycolipid OCH-NCNP1 for Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol for a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

2023· article· en· W4388930229 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tomoko Okamoto, Takami Ishizuka, Reiko Shimizu, Yasuko Asahina, Harumasa Nakamura, Yuko Shimizu, Yoichiro Nishida, Takanori Yokota, Youwei Lin, Wakiro Sato, Takashi Yamamura

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEA Pharma Co., Ltd.
KeywordsMedicineProtocol (science)Randomized controlled trialMultiple sclerosisPlaceboClinical trialPreprintPharmacologyAlternative medicineImmunologyInternal medicineComputer sciencePathologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that causes myelin sheath damage and axonal degeneration. The glycolipid (2S, 3S, 4R)-1-O-(α-d-galactosyl)-2-tetracosanoylamino-1,3,4-nonaetriol (OCH-NCNP1 or OCH) exerts an immunoregulatory action that suppresses T helper (Th)1 cell-mediated immune responses through natural killer T cell activation, selective interleukin-4 production, and Th2 bias induction in human CD4-positive natural killer T cells. OBJECTIVE: This trial aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of the immunomodulator OCH in patients with relapsing MS through 24-week repeated administration. METHODS: This protocol describes a double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II clinical trial that was initiated in September 2019. The participants were randomly assigned to either a placebo control group or an OCH-NCNP1 group and the investigational drug (3.0 mg) was orally administered once weekly for the 24-week duration. Major inclusion criteria are as follows: patients had been diagnosed with relapsing MS (relapsing-remitting and/or secondary progressive MS) based on the revised McDonald criteria or were diagnosed with MS by an attending physician as noted in their medical records; patients with at least two medically confirmed clinical exacerbations within 24 months prior to consent or one exacerbation within 12 months prior to consent; patients with at least one lesion suspected to be MS on screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); and patients with 7 points or less in the Expanded Disability Status Scale during screening. Major exclusion criteria are as follows: diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica and one of optic neuritis, acute myelitis, and satisfying at least two of the following three items: (1) spinal cord MRI lesion extending across at least three vertebral bodies, (2) no brain MRI lesions during onset (at least four cerebral white matter lesions or three lesions, one of which is around the lateral ventricle), and (3) neuromyelitis optica-immunoglobulin G or antiaquaporin-4 antibody-positive. Outcome measures include the primary outcome of MRI changes (the percentage of subjects with new or newly expanded lesions at 24 weeks on T2-weighted MRI) and the secondary outcomes annual relapse rate (number of recurrences per year), relapse-free period (time to recurrence), sustained reduction in disability (SRD) occurrence rate, period until SRD (time to SRD occurrence), no evidence of disease activity, and exploratory biomarkers from phase I trials (such as gene expression, cell frequency, and intestinal and oral microbiome). RESULTS: We plan to enroll 30 patients in the full analysis set. Enrollment was closed in June 2021 and the study analysis was completed in March 2023. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial will determine whether OCH-NCNP1 is effective and safe in patients with MS as well as provide evidence for the potential of OCH-NCNP1 as a therapeutic agent for MS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04211740; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04211740. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46709.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.250
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research Protocols→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→