Evaluation of the National Institute for Health and Care Research’s (NIHR) Global Health Research (GHR) Portfolio, First Phase (2016/17-2020/21) - Interim Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abbreviations list AMR Antimicrobial Resistance BA Bibliometric Analysis BMJ British Medical Journal CA Contribution Analysis CADA Cohort Academic Development Award CEI Community Engagement and Involvement CEPI Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation DFID Department for International Development DHSC Department for Health and Social Care ECR Early Career Researcher EDCTP European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership EF Evaluation Framework EID Emerging Infectious Disease EQ Evaluation Question EPSRC Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council ESRC Economic and Social Research Council FAF Financial Assurance Funds FCDO Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office FGD Focus Group Discussion GACD Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases GARDP Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership GCC Grand Challenges Canada GECO Global Effort on COVID-19 GESI Gender, Equality and Social Inclusion GHR Global Health Research GRP Global Research Professorships HPSR Health Policy and Systems Research ISAG Independent Scientific Advisory Group JGHTI Joint Global Health Trials Initiative KII Key Informant Interview LMIC Low- and Middle-Income Countries MEL Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning MNH Maternal and Neonatal Health MRC Medical Research Council NCD Non-Communicable Disease NHS National Health Service NIHR National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHRCC National Institute for Health and Care Research Coordinating Centre OECD DAC Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Development Assistance Committee ODA Official Development Assistance PI Principal Investigator PPI Patient and Public Involvement RCS Research Capacity Strengthening RIGHT Research and Innovation for Global Health Transformation RSTMH Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene R&D Research & Development SDG Sustainable Development Goals SMT Senior Management Team SNA Social Network Analysis SORT IT Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative SRE Science Research & Evidence SSSD Severe Stigmatising Skin Disease HEI Higher Education Institution ELHRA Enhancing Learning and Research for Humanitarian Assistance HMG Research Governance Framework COVAX COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access TDR Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases NAO National Audit Office TB Tuberculosis ToC Theory of Change TOR Terms of Reference UKCDR UK Collaborative on Development Research UKRI UK Research and Innovation UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund VfM Value for Money WHO World Health Organisation Authorship and Disclaimer Authorship The lead authors of this report are Paula Quigley, Korina Cox, Sarah Hanka, Charlotte Mitchell, Seema Khan, Liam Shah, Jamie Smith, Marta Barba Prieto, and Panos Deoudes. Lead authors acknowledge contributions from Valentina Uccioli, Valeria Miglio, ABH Partners, Access Health International, PopTrends and Aurum Institute. Disclaimer This evaluation is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Policy Research Programme (PRP) (Grant Reference Number NIHR203816). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). This report has been prepared by Ecorys for DHSC, for services specified in the Terms of Reference and contract of engagement. There are no conflicts of interest. Executive Summary Background The Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) established the Global Health Research (GHR) portfolio following the 2015 UK Aid Strategy. Its purpose is to support applied health research and training in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), addressing unmet needs and strengthening research capabilities. An initial budget of £429.5m was allocated for the first phase of the portfolio (2016/17 – 2020/21), complementing other Official Development Assistance (ODA) research funders and evolving over time to include 30 programmes that NIHR or external partners manage. The portfolio is diverse in terms of its health focus, geographical scope, and funding size and emphasises the NIHR’s operating principles of impact, excellence, effectiveness, inclusion, and collaboration, as well as strengthening research capacity, equitable partnerships and community engagement and involvement (CEI). It has grown to encompass 17 thematic areas, operate in over 50 LMICs, and has funded 616 awards in the first phase. The GHR Portfolio's Theory of Change (ToC) outlines the NIHR’s ambition to improve global health outcomes. It recognises that it may take 3-10 years for research outputs to influence policy, practice, and behaviour changes and 10-25 years for these changes to lead to strengthened health systems and increased capacity for health promotion and disease prevention. The Evaluation The DHSC commissioned Ecorys through the NIHR in December 2021 to undertake an evaluation of its first phase of activities (2016/17-20/21). The portfolio evaluation is delivered in four stages: inception, interim evaluation, final evaluation (due in December 2023) and a dissemination phase (due to be completed by March 2024). The evaluation utilises a theory-based approach to assess the contributions of the GHR Portfolio to the intended outputs, outcomes, and likely impact of investments. It focuses on assessing whether the portfolio is on track to deliver the expected results given the long-term nature of the research impact. The evaluation process involves testing the portfolio's ToC, including its assumptions and causal links, to determine the validity of the underlying theory using a contribution analysis (CA) approach. CA is an approach that allows recognition of the complexities of attribution, given a whole wide range of and and a are of – well a is and is to support of contribution likely is it that these activities and outputs lead to the in the theory of on the are expressed in terms of of it be that this to the to support a a on the The evaluation and are the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Development Assistance Committee evaluation and and and and impact. The to and community engagement and involvement and for The and and and an to funded a Social Network Analysis to assess and funded and a Bibliometric Analysis to research to be in the final evaluation phase. approach to programmes and awards for and the Evaluation This report the interim of the evaluation of the first phase of the GHR It for the portfolio's impact and is the GHR Portfolio addressing of health research in is unmet by in the The GHR Portfolio is addressing of health in The GHR Portfolio to by on thematic by other funders in The Ecorys analysis to that health given and to the underlying of these The Ecorys that the funding and the of and involvement of from The of the GHR Portfolio's in the of its be to involvement There is that the portfolio in health research a approach needs through UK and partners in global health research and through for from UK and LMIC Higher Education or Research thematic is that and the and of the portfolio's initial the and of engagement of LMIC and other be Involvement of and in the of the portfolio was are of increased involvement over awards to and The that a approach to addressing of health research and LMIC and other may be is the GHR Portfolio a funding to its NIHR has the GHR Portfolio to research funding and other UK and global health Early of initial a for research and NIHR funded programmes the thematic research There has been an to the GHR The the ToC and thematic and outputs has been programmes been results to this a in partnerships by programmes and awards and be to and and other and global health research the and programmes to engagement other funders and in and this process and awards has been has the GHR Portfolio been in its intended interim The GHR Portfolio has in its intended interim The GHR Portfolio to be by research outputs to policy, research capacity, equitable and The that the portfolio has funded programmes and awards that in these and a wide range of There is of the in research capacity including of There is of in strengthening the capacity and of as well as of capacity including LMIC research of capacity changes is this The portfolio has in equitable addressing to the equitable of LMIC is a that time and the of the of on CEI and CEI in awards over time and a to equitable engagement of LMIC a analysis of needs is to in this The CA that it is that portfolio outputs to and to in to a that the of the of its funded changes be the portfolio has in its is for in evaluation and addressing capacity and CEI the GHR Portfolio and its partners been to outputs in a and The GHR Portfolio has in the first phase of its and is There is of GHR Portfolio the portfolio in outputs in an This awards including to research in the of external as the COVID-19 and in The portfolio and for awards to to and the and of NIHR and its partners been by and There is on other of VfM effectiveness, and the GHR Portfolio an for its approach to partners and systems in global health research are to and in LMICs, including and including and are of is a for and to assess the to CEI is the as and not include from It is not to the awards are or to the changes that are as a of CEI the of and of for the and and for programmes be for LMIC research to the of research as well as the of equitable and well is the GHR Portfolio and The NIHR has a the Learning has been a of the GHR funded to to the by in a The portfolio has its to for and on needs and is for to be awards and including and This is for those operating in thematic or to the portfolio's and impact. that funded research and capacity strengthening activities are on track the to 3-10 The NIHR has the for impact through the GHR Portfolio it is to assess the long-term impact of the GHR is expected to in 10-25 years from the of the is of outcomes. The portfolio's research and activities the to influence health and and health systems in There are that the portfolio has to of research and influence to research and the in The of and for engagement and global has a in these outcomes. There is of strengthened capacity to deliver research and training in LMICs, to the initial it is to assess long-term impact, the GHR Portfolio has of and has to as equitable and other the of the GHR Portfolio or likely the funded The NIHR has in research capacity the GHR There are the and research impact and in capacity strengthening and contributions to health systems that the to be the funding and partnerships to through and funding of funding for and the research funded by NIHR GHR long-term as first awards initial research to the of the portfolio and the for to and on are It be to and the long-term of the portfolio's and to a of its in changes in health The GHR Portfolio has delivered results in research outputs, strengthening research capacity, and in The NIHR has recognition in the global health research the portfolio is and by its impact is expected over a The evaluation intended and the for and The GHR Portfolio health research in LMICs, partners and a approach. been to capacity and LMIC NIHR a to CEI in its is a to to and track changes the community The evaluation of and in to CEI and research and outcomes. the GHR Portfolio's programmes are to health research in and partnerships and is for a approach that focuses on research that is likely to be by and and the There is of and a for to and The portfolio in its and to its and the it has in to outputs in a and by and partnerships by NIHR and from its the GHR Portfolio it a to its the portfolio systems and to results the portfolio as the not include programmes and may not include from LMIC research This the of and the to for There are and a of from LMIC on may and the GHR Portfolio are to the needs of LMIC research partners and Strengthening systems the and impact of the portfolio and LMIC of funding is for and the impact of in the GHR The evaluation the for a in long-term Collaborative other funders and the the It be that these are that be in the final evaluation phase and DHSC and NIHR for and are likely to The NIHR the for the for the GHR Portfolio and is a for a approach. This be in funding partners to This a wide range of and partners or on a of thematic has been is from LMIC and the impact is Systems and improve systems and for including systems to and of the Learning and in for and to research impact and capacity strengthening and the CEI approach. a to the of CEI NIHR’s CEI and in awards to of and are in and for LMIC research LMIC research partners and capacity by and and funding for research a to on funding VfM an VfM and for programmes and awards to track and assess the by investments. VfM by other UK funders to of ODA a the of expected in the This support in for from the include training and and other funders for of this report This report the interim from evaluation of the first phase of the National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Health Research GHR Portfolio It of the effectiveness, and of the GHR as well as on community engagement and involvement and and and are for that well and that be a to for impact and The DHSC established the GHR Portfolio in to support the of the UK Aid 2015 and the United Sustainable Development Goals An initial budget of £429.5m was allocated for the first phase to applied global health research in low- and middle-income countries to Official Development Assistance The purpose of the GHR Portfolio is to support applied health research and training to unmet needs in countries by for the of in these It to research capacity, equitable partnerships UK and LMIC research to health research and that the research is in the likely to be by the research outcomes. Evaluation and The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the and of the GHR Portfolio its first phase and its and of the GHR The evaluation in the Research the of the and of the first phase of the NIHR GHR Portfolio for its intended and and the and of the phase of the GHR for the GHR Portfolio to – to include assessing the GHR contribution in and whether the GHR Portfolio is on track to its and impact and the Value for Money of to the evaluation and and the GHR the complexities of CEI in the of and and the on the to the for in and It to NIHR has partners to CEI this interim the final evaluation is to include GHR and a Bibliometric Analysis to the and impact of funded for this report the of this interim evaluation report is DHSC, its and be to NIHR and as well in the Evidence and by this evaluation is intended to be to and the GHR Evaluation The evaluation was by research partners from four to the NIHR GHR The partners are the Aurum ABH Partners, and Access Health International, been in and and and evaluation are and to capacity in the and lead dissemination in of terms in the report GHR The of NIHR’s GHR of programmes and range of research and research and capacity strengthening awards in to thematic include and a wide range of Research and capacity that are funded by the NIHR GHR UK and LMIC that through NIHR GHR The evaluation this lead and Lead by DHSC to the of a UK and LMIC in is and and on contribution the and of the Community Engagement and range of to community and in research that Early Career Researcher in the or global health years of or The of this report is as NIHR GHR Portfolio the and for the GHR Portfolio and its to It an of the GHR funded programmes and the GHR Theory of Change Evaluation and an of the evaluation approach and and the including the approach to the and The approach to the Contribution Analysis Social Network Analysis Bibliometric Analysis and thematic is in this and and and to evaluation and an of the of under Evaluation Question and of to Learning and and to the nature of equitable partnerships and Value for Money these are and from the ToC are and to from an of the Early and a of and from the and of this This the for the Evaluation as a for and NIHR’s GHR Portfolio The DHSC and NIHR established the GHR Portfolio in following the of the 2015 UK Aid and to support the United Sustainable Development Goals It to the diverse health needs of in by applied health research and training in is an unmet and strengthening LMIC and UK research and in global of the 2015 an initial ODA budget of £429.5m was allocated for the first phase of the GHR Portfolio to to in global health in It was intended that funded activities be by the following on NIHR’s operating principles of impact, excellence, effectiveness, and research and training through equitable partnerships UK and LMIC research There has been a the global health research to applied research and in on the of equitable and research in and the impact of research to health by a these is that research is and of to in The GHR Portfolio intended to from other ODA research programmes the time of its inception, as the Global Challenges Research Fund and the the of the first the GHR Portfolio to 30 of funding awards to or of and in and the Programme is by NIHR or external The programmes are by the NIHR Coordinating Centre and the programmes are by UK and partners and This was not the GHR inception, in the initial The was to the portfolio programmes to the NIHR GHR principles and by and the of thematic as and health systems and and The GHR Portfolio a range of on training and research the capacity strengthening that are as a in the GHR Portfolio are diverse in terms of health focus, geographical scope, and its and as of the GHR Portfolio grown to include 17 thematic research activities in over 50 and NIHR funded over 616 awards from to to the programmes was in and over time to include GHR GHR and European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership The programmes include the Global and Maternal Neonatal Health Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene to and the the GHR Portfolio is in the and of from awards funded by funded by the Joint Global Health Trials Initiative funded by the Antimicrobial Resistance and funded by the the geographical of research funded by the GHR the awards that are in of the evaluation and and the and awards are to LMIC This of GHR portfolio awards to LMIC of these are under and funded This is by funded under these 17 this has increased from LMIC in to in this in the of the years is The GHR Portfolio to that the GHR has to and and from a of The Independent Scientific Advisory Group and on the of the GHR Portfolio the of that the GHR and programmes The GHR Programme the GHR the of this its and and to support and of the GHR The to the Science Research & Evidence Senior Management Team and the Scientific for the and and policy, and on and from the SRE The GHR Portfolio a wide range of the GHR Portfolio was in DHSC partners well established in the global health research as the Medical Research Council and the The GHR these funders to and for funding on of in global health NIHR its capacity to for research from UK LMIC research partnerships on LMIC health research The NIHR GHR from a a to a global health DHSC as the first for NIHR’s GHR This is expected to of the GHR and and GHR a analysis of of the UK ODA was the Aid this was the first of its and the of the ODA portfolio DHSC, this is a The GHR Portfolio ToC, by the DHSC GHR NIHRCC and other the ambition for the GHR contribution to global health outcomes. The GHR ToC the GHR funded activities and outputs are intended to to long-term changes in health and health The ToC causal on theory from on health research impact and that it may 10-25 years for changes in policy, and behaviour to strengthened health systems and increased and community capacity for health promotion and disease to over time as a of a wide range of external including changes in the or and are on a of in The ToC is of the following activities in the GHR Portfolio are expected to and in the The ToC outlines results including or research and outputs that to global health research dissemination and LMIC and UK research capacity strengthening activities and or strengthened equitable research partnerships and thematic 3-10 are intended to to that influence policy, practice, and community behaviour in The ToC dissemination and activities and the research and is to policy, and LMIC capacity is expected to and to research and 10-25 in policy, and behaviour are expected to lead to impact on health systems and and and The ToC that include health systems in that are to and to health and of LMIC health increased and community capacity for health promotion and disease and of the LMIC research that of the ToC are expected to support the intended and include community engagement and equitable partnerships and funders to impact and of to the ToC for the GHR Portfolio are assumptions the for activities to lead and long-term The approach to testing these assumptions and the validity of the ToC is in The ToC is a for the of the evaluation approach and as in The NIHR GHR Portfolio has delivered research activities an initial budget of £429.5m 30 programmes and over its first phase from to this time the NIHR has established as a and in the GHR in the UK and the The GHR Portfolio activities to needs of health research in LMICs, the research capacity of and in the UK and LMICs, equitable and the of community engagement as an of global health as it is years and was by this is a to changes in and be expected to to strengthened health systems and health outcomes. results are over a this evaluation has been to assess intended and impact. that this is an time for the NIHR to take of the over the first phase and a approach to that the the impact The GHR programmes are to health research in LMICs, a of and This is by NIHR’s other a in and NIHR to and LMIC to a approach research to be the and of engagement LMIC and other be NIHR has to its capacity to that it is a in the of capacity to research and strengthening the engagement and involvement of LMIC the of the ToC in partners of partners a on funding from other and the principles of NIHR are in its including equitable partnerships and NIHR a to CEI in its including other funding approach and and programmes in the GHR Portfolio and may to The diverse funding partnerships in the first phase and the NIHR to deliver a wide range of activities and partnerships the phase grown and is a time to take of on the of the GHR Portfolio and the partners to deliver There is to and the other UK funders MRC and and partners in this process that are and the the NIHR’s approach to a to the GHR Portfolio and be programmes and awards be The GHR Portfolio has its to NIHR to outputs in an and by NIHR and from its partners are in the to and to deliver in in the GHR Portfolio and the of for LMIC research There are for to on from LMIC to improve on There is that the GHR Portfolio is on track to and CA that influence on or are well in and are in terms of strengthening research capacity and and equitable the of the GHR Portfolio the to assess and of and improve as the not It on as There are and support for and dissemination to support the of research to research impact and to equitable The NIHR’s to CEI is in a and approach that has other funding the and from LMIC to and changes the community The NIHR has CEI as a and are of changes the community community is not and the changes that are are not in an of or and behaviour There is of GHR or and and these CEI and research and outcomes. The approach to collaboration, and has in a GHR Portfolio that is be to support and the equitable approach. The GHR Portfolio for programmes and awards to to and and not the needs and of LMIC research an for and for equitable and LMIC and the that has NIHR the first this has not for and from and the GHR There are to and systems that and support to the and impact of is a of to to the from LMIC research of this by NIHR not the of the research outputs equitable partnerships and to VfM is a by NIHR and its partners to including in and of the GHR Portfolio and programmes as well as to and the GHR approach not from a VfM and for the in the National Audit VfM as well as This that VfM is not the GHR Portfolio to support to GHR and in funding to research and activities the long-term of NIHR investments. or be to from the and support in The NIHR has and funding of unmet of funding is for the and of This to to funding as well as to and research impact and the long-term of NIHR’s investments. Early and It be that these are that be in the final evaluation phase and DHSC and NIHR for and are likely to The NIHR the of the GHR Portfolio and in its funding the NIHR the The NIHR to it to the approach other funding partners and a wide range of areas, and UK and LMIC research it on a of thematic areas, the in on it has the first phase and is likely to the impact over the This include is and and from in This process has the of a and a of the for the the and may be in other funders for of and on are funding partnerships and funders and partners in the UK and this this is the approach the ToC to be to it and NIHR for strengthening systems and for of a and diverse it is not to partnerships to systems to be and MEL to on and programmes and awards and of programmes Global and on and or for by NIHR these for on from LMIC to improve on NIHR the of research impact and RCS by in for and and and it is that and and support activities NIHR to the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.163 | 0.200 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".