Hospital-treated prevalent infections, the plasma proteome and incident dementia among UK older adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The plasma proteome can mediate the association of hospital-treated infections with dementia incidence. We screened up to 37,269 UK Biobank participants aged 50-74 years for the presence of a prevalent hospital-treated infection, subsequently tested as a predictor for ≤1,463 plasma proteins and dementia incidence. Four-way decomposition models decomposed infection-dementia total effect into pure mediation, pure interaction, neither or both through the plasma proteome. Hospital-treated infections increased dementia two-fold. The strongest mediation effect was through the growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) protein. Top 17 proteomic mediators explained collectively 5% of the total effect, while pathway analysis of all mediators (k = 221 plasma proteins) revealed top pathways including the immune system, signal transduction, metabolism, disease and metabolism of proteins, with the GDF15 cluster reflecting most strongly the "transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway". The association of hospital-treated infections with dementia was partially mediated through GDF15 and other plasma proteomic markers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".