Kapitel XIII. Övergripande resultat och sammanfattning av intervjuernas resultat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Chapter XIII. Comprehensive scores and summary of interview results] In Chapter XIII of The Authoritarian Personality , Else Frenkel-Brunswik evaluates the interviews conducted by the project’s research assistants. While Adorno’s typology in Chapter XIX, also included in this journal issue, encompasses a set of syndromes (or characters), Frenkel-Brunswik here seeks rather to understand the overall differences between the most and the least prejudiced: how they orient themselves in both intimate relationships and generally in society, and in their ability to endure and deal with ambiguous situations. In the Freudian tradition, she discusses at length how relationships with parents in early childhood influence later attitudes, as well as the ability for creative and independent thinking. In this she also uses results from her own research on how children’s attitudes are formed at an early age. The text also demonstrates Frenkel-Brunswik’s methodological rigor, which derives from her schooling in the vicinity of the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle. Publication history: Translation of the third section (C) of Chapter XIII, “Comprehensive scores and summary of interview results”, in Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson & R. Nevitt Sanford, The Authoritarian Personality (Harper & Brothers 1950). Published by permission of the rights holder American Jewish Committee, https://www.ajc.org/ . (Published 23 November 2023) Citation: Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (2023) “Kapitel XIII. Övergripande resultat och sammanfattning av intervjuernas resultat”, in Den auktoritära personligheten. Det vita fältet IV , special issue of Arkiv. Tidskrift för samhällsanalys , issue 16, pp. 117–136. https://doi.org/10.13068/2000-6217.16.4
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.153 | 0.095 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".