Français de référence et français régional : les représentations linguistiques des Jurassiens entre norme et identité cantonale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Jura, le canton de formation plus récente, possède une histoire sans pareil dans le contexte helvétique, qui se reflète sur tout ce qui concerne la langue.Aux politiques de soutien à la Francophonie, d'un côté, et au patois jurassien, de l'autre, s'ajoute la présence de régionalismes à tout niveau du système linguistique.Ainsi, en nous interrogeant sur la perception que les locuteurs jurassiens ont de cette variété, nous menons une enquête par le biais d'un questionnaire administré en ligne.Nous interprétons les données quantitatives obtenues selon des concepts de base de l'étude des représentations linguistiques -« sécurité linguistique » et « insécurité linguistique » -, ainsi que du modèle « centre-périphérie ».La contribution vise à faire émerger ce que les répondants pensent du concept même de « français standard » et des marques régionales de leur parler : les déprécient-ils ou, au contraire, en sont-ils fiers en tant que symboles identitaires ?Mots-clés : sociolinguistique, représentation linguistique, français régional, canton du Jura Abstract : Jura, the most recently formed canton, has a history which is unique in the context of Switzerland and this is reflected in everything related to the language.In addition to the policies in support of Francophonie, on the one hand, and the Jura dialect, on the other, there are regionalisms at every level of the linguistic system.Thus, by delving further into the perception that Jurassian speakers have of this variety, we conduct a survey through an online questionnaire.We interpret the quantitative data obtained according to the basic concepts of the study of language representations -"linguistic security" and "linguistic insecurity" -as well as the "centre-periphery" model.The contribution aims to highlight how the participants feel about the concept of "standard French" and the regional marks of their way of speaking : do they depreciate them or, on the contrary, are they proud of them as symbols of identity ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".