The Rtf1/Prf1-dependent histone modification axis and Rpb1 C-terminal domain phosphorylation counteract multi-drug resistance in fission yeast
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription elongation directs an intricate pattern of histone modifications. Formation of this pattern involves a highly conserved regulatory axis, key components of which are the elongation factor Rtf1, monoubiquitylation of histone H2B (H2Bub1), and methylation of histone H3 on lysine 4 (H3K4me). Direct contact between Rtf1 and the ubiquitylation complex Rad6-Bre1 stimulates H2Bub1, which in turn promotes H3K4me by stimulating the activity of the Set1C/COMPASS methyltransferase complex. Previous studies have defined the molecular basis for these regulatory relationships, but it remains unclear how they regulate chromatin and transcription in vivo . We found that mutations affecting multiple components of the Rtf1-H2Bub1-H3K4me axis in the model eukaryote Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) caused resistance to the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU). Resistance correlated with a reduced effect of HU on dNTP pools, bypass of the S-phase checkpoint in the presence of HU, and blunting of the transcriptional response to HU treatment. Mutations in the C-terminal repeat domain (CTD) of the RNAPII large subunit Rpb1 led to a similar spectrum of phenotypes. Moreover, all the HU resistant mutants we identified also exhibited resistance to several azole class antifungal agents. Our results suggest a novel, shared gene regulatory function of the Rtf1-H2Bub1-H3K4me axis and the Rpb1 CTD in controlling fungal drug tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".