Investigating the spontaneous brain activities of patients with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment: an amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation functional magnetic resonance imaging study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are neurodegenerative processing stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cognitive decline is thought to manifest in intrinsic brain activity changes, but research results yielded conflicting and few studies have explored the roles of brain regions in cognitive decline, and sensitivity of the cognitive field to changes in the altered intrinsic brain activity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 158 elderly participants were recruited from the memory clinic of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2019 to May 2021, and grouped into SCD (n=73), MCI (n=46), and normal controls (NC) (n=39). The amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) was calculated and evaluated among the groups. Then canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was conducted to investigate the associations between imaging outcomes and cognitive behaviors. Results: Neuropsychological tests in different cognitive dimensions and ALFF values of the prefrontal, parietal, and temporal gyrus, were significantly different (P<0.05) among the three groups, with no appreciable decline in daily activity. The changes in intrinsic activities were closely related to the decline in cognitive function (R=0.73, P=0.002). ALFF values in the left middle occipital gyrus, right middle frontal gyrus, left superior frontal gyrus, left angular gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus played significant roles in the analysis, while the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Auditory-Verbal Learning Test scores were found to be more sensitive to changes in ALFF values. Conclusions: Spontaneous brain activity is a stable imaging biomarker of cognitive impairment. ALFF changes of the prefrontal, occipital, left angular, and temporal gyrus were sensitive to identifying cognitive decline, and the scores of the Auditory-Verbal Learning Test and MoCA could predict the abnormal intrinsic activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".