MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388979299 · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101759

Development and application of feature engineered geological layers for ranking magmatic, volcanogenic, and orogenic system components in Archean greenstone belts

2023· article· en· W4388979299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Frontiers · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsGeologyFeature (linguistics)Mineral explorationArcheanEarth scienceComputer scienceGeophysicsGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geologically representative feature engineering is a crucial component in geoscientific applications of machine learning. Many commonly applied feature engineering techniques used to produce input variables for machine learning apply geological knowledge to generic data science techniques, which can lead to ambiguity, geological oversimplification, and/or compounding subjective bias. Workflows that utilize minimally processed input variables attempt to overcome these issues, but often lead to convoluted and uninterpretable results. To address these challenges, new and enhanced feature engineering methods were developed by combining geological knowledge, understanding of data limitations, and a variety of data science techniques. These include non-Euclidean fluid pre-deformation path distance, rheological and chemical contrast, geologically constrained interpolation of characteristic host rock geochemistry, interpolation of mobile element gain/loss, assemblages, magnetic intensity, structural complexity, host rock physical properties. These methods were applied to compiled open-source and new field observations from Archean greenstone terranes in the Abitibi and western Wabigoon sub-provinces of the Superior Province near Timmins and Dryden, Ontario, respectively. Resulting feature maps represent conceptually significant components in magmatic, volcanogenic, and orogenic mineral systems. A comparison of ranked feature importance from random forests to conceptual mineral system models show that the feature maps adequately represent system components, with a few exceptions attributed to biased training data or limited constraint data. The study also highlights the shared importance of several highly ranked features for the three mineral systems, indicating that spatially related mineral systems exploit the same features when available. Comparing feature importance when classifying orogenic Au mineralization in Timmins and Dryden provides insights into the possible cause of contrasting endowment being related to fluid source. The study demonstrates that integrative studies leveraging multi-disciplinary data and methodology have the potential to advance geological understanding, maximize data utility, and generate robust exploration targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it