MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388981979 · doi:10.55016/ojs/muj.v1i1.77015

Table of Contents

2023· article· en· W4388981979 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melissa Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Motley Undergraduate Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Culture and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyAestheticsGender studiesCommodificationMedia studiesArt historyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AcknowledgementsMELISSA MORRIS p. 3 Letter From the EditorMARIA BAKARDJIEVA p. 5 The Motley Editorial Team p. 7 Meet the Authors p. 11 Research and Analytical Articles Frederick Douglass: Visibility of a visionaryARIADNA ALVARADO p. 14 The face of Orientalism: The western appropriation and commodification of Asian culture ABIGAIL ATMADJA p. 26 Performing Muslim identities through embodiment- Self-representing through fashion, aesthetics, and styleASMA BERNIER p. 38 The contemporary aesthetics of adolescence: How Euphoria uses style to spectacularize representation of modern youth in the articulation of a teenage gazeLANA COLES p. 58 Sigma male grindset as alienation and asceticism: A rejection of individual emancipation in the work of Karl MarxCLAIRE HADFORD p. 82 Can the line cook speak: A critical discourse analysis of the voice and representation of Canadian restaurant staff during the Covid-19 pandemicBRAY JAMIESON p. 96 Kidfluencers and conundrums: The rising need for Internet policy that addresses child labour and safetyMELISSA MORRIS p. 116 History of Transnational cinema and feminist film theory: Understanding the potential of Transnational women’s filmASHA SARA p. 128 Creative Research A visual rhetorical analysis of Queer visibility strategies active in contemporary American televisionMADISON DANIELS p. 135 EN-LIGHTEN-ED: The politics of Black hairGLORY OKELEKE p. 136 Archaic methods, subculture sensibilities, outside aesthetics & Instagram: A humble cultural artifact attempts to resist the almighty algorithmCALUM ROBERTSON p. 137

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Motley Undergraduate JournalSame topicAsian Culture and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207