Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Zealand context, 75 Area studies, 10, 93 building comparison in, 94-95 Article review process, 141 Assessments, 188-189, 200 Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), 101 Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), 109 Author co-citation analysis (ACA), 152 Berlin Declaration on Education for Sustainable Development (2021), 51 Bibliometric analysis, 138, 159 Bibliometric review, 161 Big data analysis, 94 Bio-Circular-Green Economy Model (BCG Economy Model), 50, 62 Bologna Process, 102, 112-113, 156 Bonn Declaration, 51 British colonial rule, 188 Budget, 98, 103 "Butterfly collector" approach, 94 Campus sustainability, 51, 53-54 Canada, 74-75, 77, 80 Canadian context, 76-77 Capabilities Approach (CA), 27 barriers in higher education admissions in Turkey and China, 29-31 framework, 28 Capability, 28 Central administration, 106 Central Education Council, 104-105, 114 Centralization, 98-99 China, 26 barriers in Higher education admissions in, 29 comparing and contrasting, 27-28 Citizens Foundation, 188 Civil society, 133 Co-create, co-design, co-produce, and co-reflect (4Cos), 65-67, 69 Colonialism, 75 Commitment from other Partners, 67 Common education, 106-107 Community action model, 54-55 INDEX Community Commitment, 67 Community living labs, sustainability projects in, 58 Community sustainability, 51, 54 Community-based participatory research (CBPR), 58 Community-driven model (CAM), 54 Comparative and international education, 93-94, 208, 210 Comparative and International Education Society (CIES), 94 Comparative approaches, 56-57 Comparative education, 3-4, 93-94, 207 (see also Inclusive education) difference, 14-15 professionalization of, 7-9 purposes of annual review of, 4-7 reflecting on organizational categories in annual review, 12-14 reflecting on state of field, 9-12 scholars, 21 tools of, 9-10 Comparative study, 10, 31, 56 Competence, 155, 170 Composite Deterrence Plan (CDP), 195 Comprehensive Response Plan (CRP), 195 Concentric diversification, 209 Conglomerate diversification approach, 209 Consortium of Higher Education Researchers (CHER), 101 Content analysis, 32, 155, 186, 192 "Copy & paste" process, 120 Council of Higher Education (CoHE), 30 COVID-19 pandemic, 166, 173-176, 209-210 virus, 175 Criminology, 9 Critical Cultural Political Economy of Education (CCPEE), 186 approach, 186 framework, 190 Cultural Political Economy (CPE), 186 Culturally responsive pedagogy, 83-84 Curricular reforms, 193, 196 Curriculum, 6, 8 Curriculum, campus, culture, and community ("Four Cs" approach), 54, 63 Danish developments, 171-172 Danish government, The, 178
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.707 | 0.723 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".