MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Sepsis‐Associated Proteinase 3 Induces Endothelial Permeability

2016· article· en· W4389007370 on OpenAlexaff
Eric K. Patterson, Gediminas Cepinskas, Ken Inoue, Douglas D. Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepsisVascular permeabilityUmbilical veinMedicineEndothelial stem cellImmunologyElastaseEndothelial dysfunctionDegranulationDextranInternal medicineAndrologyIn vitroGastroenterologyEndocrinologyChemistryEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response to known or suspected infection, and associated with microvascular dysfunction and capillary leak. The cause of capillary leak may be due to substances released by activated polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) that adhere to microvascular endothelial cells. Following binding, PMN often degranulate releasing azurophilic enzymes ( e.g. elastase and proteinase 3 (PR3)) at the endothelial surface and into plasma. We hypothesized that the actions of these enzymes, particularly PR3 contribute to the loss of endothelial integrity. Patients with severe sepsis (sepsis with evidence of at least one organ dysfunctioning), were recruited on admission to the intensive care unit. Patient samples were paired with age and sex‐matched controls. The mean age was 50 ± 14 years, 3/10 males for both sepsis and controls. Septic patient pathogens were determined to be 4 gram positive, 4 gram negative and 2 culture negative; survival outcomes were 9/10 patients surviving. We employed ELISAs to determine plasma PR3 concentrations and in vitro permeability assays using Texas Red‐Dextran flow to determine the effect of PR3 on human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayer integrity. The sepsis plasma PR3 concentration was significantly higher (p < 0.001) compared to controls (55.4 ±8.8 vs 7.7 ±2 ng/mL). For in vitro permeability assays, we employed concentrations of PR3 higher than the plasma measurements in order to more closely mimic conditions at the site of degranulation. 1 hour of PR3 treatment (5 μg/mL) significantly increased HUVEC permeability to Texas Red‐Dextran compared to controls. The loss of endothelial integrity secondary to PR3 release by adhered PMNs could result in microvascular dysfunction and capillary leak. Endothelial injury could also exacerbate further PMN recruitment. Since other enzymes are contained in the same granules as PR3, they may also have significant actions on endothelial cells, these will be studied in the future. We conclude that neutrophil degranulation, as evidenced by increased PR3 plasma concentrations, can lead to increased endothelial permeability through a mechanism which in part involves the actions of PR3. Support or Funding Information Funded by the Lawson Health Research Institute Internal Research Fund.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→