MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The extent of vascular remodeling is dependent on the balance between ERα and GPER(GPR30)

2016· article· en· W4389007377 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Gros, Qingming Ding, Yasin Hussain, Jozef Chorazyczewski, G W Pickering, Ross D. Feldman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGPERInternal medicineEndocrinologyEstrogen receptorEstrogenVascular smooth muscleReceptorChemistryBiologyCell biologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estrogens are important physiological and pathophysiological regulators of cardiovascular function. The traditional view of the mechanism for these cardiovascular effects has focused on the activation of “classical” steroid receptors (i.e., estrogen receptors‐ERs). However, recent studies have elucidated the mechanism of estrogen's cardiovascular effects mediated by an alternate GPCR‐based mechanism viz., via GPER (aka GPR30), formerly characterized as an “orphan receptor”. We are beginning to appreciate that to understand the effect of estradiol in cardiovascular regulation one must understand the balance between GPER‐ and ER‐mediated effects. In vascular smooth muscle cells, estrogen‐mediated regulation of apoptotic cell death and proliferation is divergently regulated by activation of ER vs. GPER. However, the significance of this divergence in the in vivo regulation of vascular growth processes was unknown. To determine the role of GPER in regulating vascular remodeling we studied the effects of altering GPER expression vs. altering the expression of ERα in a rat model of carotid ligation. Under baseline conditions, 1 week following carotid ligation and endothelial disruption with distilled water installation there was a 51±7.6% (n=3) increase in medial thickness, paralleling neointimal proliferation in female rats. This medial hypertrophy paralleled down‐regulation of GPER protein content (26±5% of control; n=3) and mRNA expression (29±13% of control; n=3). Re‐introduction of GPER, via abluminal adenoviral delivery, significantly attenuated the extent of medial hypertrophy (adeno‐GPER: 28±2.2% increase; n=10 vs. adeno‐GFP/control: 48±3.3% increase; n=16, p<0.05). Similarly, inhibition of ERα expression using an adeno‐shERαRNA construct resulted in an attenuation of injury‐mediated medial hypertrophy. In these studies we show that in vivo the balance between GPER and ERα is a significant regulator in the extent of vascular remodeling. Receptor‐specific modulation of estrogen's growth regulatory effects may be an important new approach in modifying the extent of vascular remodeling in both acute settings like vascular injury and perhaps in longer term models of regulation like in hypertension. Support or Funding Information These studies were supported by grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (RG and RDF).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicEstrogen and related hormone effects→French-language works237,207→