MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association between Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Prevalence of Premenstrual Symptoms

2016· article· en· W4389007595 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alicia Caroline Jarosz, Joseph Jamnik, Ahmed El‐Sohemy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMedicineNauseaDepression (economics)MoodOdds ratioBloatingAnxietyConfidence intervalPopulationInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Hormonal contraceptive (HC) use may be associated with a reduction in some premenstrual symptoms, however, the evidence remains equivocal. Objective To determine the prevalence of premenstrual symptoms in a multiethnic population of women and to investigate the association between hormonal contraceptive use and premenstrual symptoms. Methods 1048 women aged 20–29 years participating in the Toronto Nutrigenomics and Health Study provided data on their premenstrual symptoms and HC use. Severity of symptoms was classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Frequencies of premenstrual symptoms were determined as a total and by ethnicity. Logistic regressions were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to analyze the associations between symptoms and use of HCs, adjusting for ethnicity. Results The prevalence of individual symptoms differed as follows: cramps (75%), bloating (74%), mood swings (72%), increased appetite (64%), acne (61%), fatigue (55%), sexual desire (50%), anxiety (35%), desire to be alone (33%), depression (28%), headache (26%), confusion (21%), clumsiness (15%), nausea (15%), and insomnia (11%). Prevalence of cramps, bloating, acne, sexual desire, headache, confusion, and nausea differed between ethnicities (P<0.05). For example, cramps were reported by 79% of Caucasians and 84% of South Asians, but only 67% of East Asians. The OR (95% CIs) for experiencing the following moderate/severe symptoms in women using HCs compared with those not using HCs were: cramps 0.48 (0.33–0.70), fatigue 0.64 (0.44–0.95), depression 0.35 (0.19–0.65), desire to be alone 0.32 (0.18–0.58), clumsiness 0.22 (0.06–0.74), confusion 0.21 (0.08–0.54), and anxiety 0.41 (0.24–0.70). Premenstrual symptoms of acne, mood swings, bloating, increased appetite, headache, insomnia, nausea, and sexual desire were not associated with HC use. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the prevalence of premenstrual symptoms varies widely between symptoms and ethnicities. Our findings also indicate that HC use is associated with a lower risk of experiencing many, but not all premenstrual symptoms. Support or Funding Information Research support: A.C.J. is a recipient of a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Graduate Scholarship

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207