MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Comparing the Impact of Saturated Fatty Acids from Different Dairy Sources on Plasma Lipids: Preliminary Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial

2016· article· en· W4389008941 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maude Tessier‐Grenier, Didier Brassard, Ethendhar Rajendiran, Yongbo She, Vanu Ramprasath, Iris Gigleux, Émile Lévy, Angelo Tremblay, Peter J.H. Jones, Patrick Couture, Benoı̂t Lamarche

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversity of ManitobaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood scienceContext (archaeology)Polyunsaturated fatty acidCrossover studyDairy foodsSaturated fatSaturated fatty acidCarbohydrateChemistryFatty acidCholesterolAnimal scienceMedicineBiologyBiochemistryPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the impact of saturated fatty acids (SFA) from different dairy products, namely cheese and butter, on plasma lipid levels in men and women. Methods This multicenter randomized crossover trial study involved 90 men and women with abdominal obesity and relatively low HDL‐C levels from the Quebec City and Winnipeg metropolitan areas. Subjects were randomized to sequences of 5 diets of 4 weeks each, with a 4 week washout between diets. The 5 isocaloric diets were the following: 1) a diet rich in SFA from cheese (CHEESE); 2) a diet rich in SFA from butter (BUTTER); 3) a diet rich in mono‐unsaturated fatty acids (MUFA); 4) a diet rich in poly‐unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA); and 5) a low‐fat, high carbohydrate diet (CHO). The macronutrient, calcium and sodium content of each diet is shown in . All foods were provided to participants in the context of this feeding study. Preliminary results Preliminary results are presented for a total of 57 participants recruited in Quebec City. There was no significant change in anthropometric measurements among the five diets. BUTTER significantly raised serum LDL‐C and HDL‐C (+7.1% and +8.0% respectively, p<0.01) while CHEESE only raised serum HDL‐C (+5.3%, p<0.05) compared with CHO. Serum LDL‐C concentrations were higher with BUTTER than with CHEESE (+2.5%, p=0.02) while serum TG were higher with CHEESE than with BUTTER (+9.5%, p=0.007). Lowest serum LDL‐C concentrations were seen after the MUFA and the PUFA diets. Conclusion Preliminary data from this carefully controlled feeding study suggest that the cardiometabolic change induced by consumption of SFA may be influenced by its food source. SFA from cheese may have less of an effect on serum LDL‐C but may be associated with increased plasma TG levels compared with SFA from butter. This suggests that the food matrix may influence the impact of constituent nutrients on health. The impact of such findings in terms of cardiovascular risk needs to be investigated further. Support or Funding Information Dairy Research Cluster Initiative ( Dairy Farmers of Canada, Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada, the Canadian Dairy Network and the Canadian Dairy Commission) Macronutrient (% energy), calcium and sodium content of experimental diets CHEESE BUTTER MUFA PUFA CHO Lipids (%) 32 32 32 32 25 SFA (%) 13 13 6 6 6 MUFA (%) 14 14 21 14 14 PUFA (%) 5 5 5 12 5 Carbohydrates (%) 52 52 52 52 59 Proteins (%) 16 16 16 16 16 Calcium (mg/2500 kcal) 1261 812 812 812 842 Sodium (mg/2500 kcal) 2482 2480 2479 2479 2485

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicDiet and metabolism studies→French-language works237,207→