MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Minimal effect of aliskiren on renal vascular effects of fat embolism in an acute rat model

2017· article· en· W4389016447 on OpenAlexaff
Farzad Khalafi, Hisham Elsherbiny, Vaishnavi Vaidyanathan, Yembur Ahmad, Alan Poisner, Agostino Molteni

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdventitiaSalineFibrosisLosartanUrologyLungInternal medicineLumen (anatomy)Renin–angiotensin systemPathologyEndocrinologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction In a rat model of fat embolism (FE) induced by injection of triolein (T), a severe inflammatory reaction leads to vasoconstriction and pulmonary fibrosis (1). Lung damage is already evident at 48 hrs, and after partial resolution, a second phase of increasing severity develops up to 10 weeks. (2) The renin angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in the process: administration of captopril and losartan prevents the acute inflammatory response and fibrotic process in the lungs (3) and the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren (ALI) also protects the lungs from vasculitis, and fibrotic change in an early phase (48 hrs) (4). We extended the study of ALI to the kidneys by evaluating the renal arterial response to T treatment in this model of FE. Methods 22 Sprague Dawley rats received T (0.2 ml IV, n=18) or saline (n=4). The T treated rats were divided into three groups of 6 rats each and injected IP one hour later with 0.2 ml saline, ALI 50mg/kg or ALI 100mg/kg. Four controls received saline. Rats were killed 48 hrs later; the organs fixed and stained with H&E. Trichrome stain was used for fibrosis evaluation. The vascular evaluation included lumen patency (LP) and media adventitia ratio (MAR), a marker of edema. LP was determined by the ratio of luminal internal diameter of the media vs. its external diameter. MAR was measured by the external medial diameter vs. external adventitia diameter. 10 photos at 400 X were taken by two pathologists unaware of the slide identity. Two photos at 100 X were also taken in each slide for evaluation of fibrosis. In addition to this evaluation, we also divided the arteries into two groups: small caliber with diameter of <150 mm (mostly located in the cortical section) and the larger caliber >150 mm (mostly present in tubuli). Results No significant difference was observed for the LP in any of the treatments, P=0.8669. However there was a significant effect on the MAR when all the arteries were considered, P=0.0007. The statistical difference in the MAR was due to effects on the larger arteries >150 mm with P=0.0033 with no differences in the small arteries. Renal fibrosis was minimal with the same amount in each group, mostly located around the arteries. Conclusion These findings were different than our observations in the lungs where statistical significance was observed in LP of the T treated rats vs. controls, and the 50 mg ALI treated rats. Fibrosis was severe in the lungs with damage mostly located around the small caliber arteries. The study suggests that the influence of the RAS on renal arteries after FE may be different from those in the lungs or that the course of time changes is different in the two organs. Nevertheless, ALI treatment did show protection against effects of T on the media adventitia ratio implicating the RAS in some effects of FE on the kidney at 48 hrs. Support or Funding Information Mary Katherine Geldmacher Research Foundation, St Louis MO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders→French-language works237,207→