MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Genome‐Wide Screen for <i>Escherichia coli</i> [NiFe]‐Hydrogenase Maturation Factors

2017· article· en· W4389016630 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michael J. Lacasse, Jean‐Philippe Côté, Eric D. Brown, Deborah B. Zamble

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHydrogenaseArchaeaFunction (biology)Escherichia coliBimetallic stripChemistryComputational biologyBacteriaGeneBiologyEnzymeBiochemistryCombinatorial chemistryCatalysisCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[NiFe]‐hydrogenases catalyze the reversible oxidation of hydrogen gas at an intricate bimetallic active site to facilitate the anaerobic growth of many bacteria and archaea.(1) The maturation of this enzyme relies on a network of cellular pathways: for instance, the incorporation of nickel and iron cofactors both rely on specific metallochaperones as well as their respective metal homeostasis networks.(2) Therefore, [NiFe]‐hydrogenase activity can serve as a beacon for many related biochemical pathways. Furthermore, the ability to tune [NiFe]‐hydrogenase activity has garnered much interest for potential applications to the hydrogen economy and as a novel antibiotic target.(3,4) However, current methodologies to measure hydrogenase activity are time consuming and require specialized equipment, limiting discoveries of novel hydrogenase‐related applications. In order to answer these issues, we designed, optimized, and validated a [NiFe]‐hydrogenase assay in E. coli that is amenable to high‐throughput screening. We have applied this assay to screen the Keio collection(5) in search of the remaining genes that contribute, directly or indirectly, to [NiFe]‐hydrogenase maturation. Here we report the discovery and characterization of genes that had no previously known function. Support or Funding Information This work was supported in part by funding from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteinsFrench-language works237,207