MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Skeletal Muscle Adaptations to Exercise in a Pre‐clinical Model of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1

2017· article· en· W4389017269 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexander Manta, Derek W. Stouth, Irena A. Rebalka, Jayne M. Kalmar, Thomas J. Hawke, Vladimir Ljubicic

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyotonic dystrophyMuscular dystrophyMyotoniaSkeletal muscleWastingMedicineMyopathyInternal medicineMuscle weaknessEndocrinologyWeaknessBiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myotonic dystrophy type I (DM1) is the second most common muscular dystrophy (MD), and most prevalent adult form of MD. Caused by a CTG microsatellite repeat expansion in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the DMPK gene, muscle weakness, wasting, myotonia, and insulin resistance most prominently characterize DM1. Recent studies investigating the therapeutic efficacy of exercise training in DM1 patients demonstrate that chronic physical activity can elicit some functional benefits. Enhancing our understanding of exercise‐induced alterations in DM1 biology may assist in the discovery of effective lifestyle and/or pharmacological interventions to mitigate DM1. Thus, the purpose of this investigation was to examine exercise‐induced skeletal muscle plasticity in a pre‐clinical model of DM1. Three groups of mice (3–6 months old, n = 10–14/group) were utilized: i) sedentary human skeletal actin‐long repeat (HSA‐LR) mice (SED‐DM1), ii) HSA‐LR mice with volitional access to a home cage running wheel for 6–8 weeks (EX‐DM1), and iii) sedentary wild‐type mice (WT). HSA‐LR animals are engineered to possess a CTG expansion of ~250 repeats in the 3′ UTR of the HSA gene. These mice best recapitulate the myopathy characteristic of the human disorder, and thus serve as the most heavily employed pre‐clinical model of DM1. EX‐DM1 animals ran 5.6 km/day, which is similar to the running volume of healthy, WT mice previously reported in the literature. Utilizing the pen test to examine muscular endurance and motor performance, the WT group exhibited a significantly higher score, as compared to SED‐DM1 mice. The pen test score was normalized in the EX‐DM1 group. EX‐DM1 mice also demonstrated rescued forelimb grip strength, which was 24% lower (p < 0.05) in the SED‐DM1 animals versus the WT group. Direct, in situ stimulation of the plantar flexor muscle group revealed that chronic exercise normalized the aberrant force‐frequency relationship observed between WT and SED‐DM1 groups. Furthermore, EX‐DM1 animals demonstrated a tendency for enhanced fatigue resistance relative to WT and SED‐DM1 mice during repetitive, electrical stimulation‐evoked muscle contractile activity in situ. Finally, preliminary results suggest that chronic exercise can diminish the severity of myotonic discharges observed in the muscle of DM1 mice. Collectively, our data suggest that chronic physical activity elicits numerous favorable adaptations in DM1 biology. Examination of the underlying molecular mechanisms driving this beneficial muscle remodelling is warranted. Support or Funding Information Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→