MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A high fiber cookie made with VERSAFIBE&[trade] 1490 dietary fiber reduces post‐prandial glucose and insulin responses in healthy adults

2017· article· en· W4389018751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Stewart, Jacques Zimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFood scienceGlycemicMealDietary fiberPost-prandialMorningInsulinWheat flourMaltodextrinDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineChemistryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

VERSAFIBE™ 1490 dietary fiber is a resistant starch type 4 derived from potato, containing 90% total dietary fiber (TDF, AOAC 991.43 method). This low‐viscosity fiber ingredient has many food applications, including snacks, bread, pasta, and cookies. In this double‐blind, randomized, cross‐over study, we compared the glycemic response to two cookies in 28 healthy adults. The test cookie was formulated with VERSAFIBE 1490 dietary fiber and refined wheat flour (24.1 g TDF) and the control cookie was formulated with maltodextrin and refined wheat flour (0.5 g TDF, control). The cookies were matched for total weight, total carbohydrate, sugars, protein, and fat. Subjects were randomly assigned the treatment order. The primary outcome was the two‐hour (baseline to 120 min) intravenous blood glucose incremental area under the curve (iAUC 0‐120min ). During each 24‐hour study period, subjects consumed a standard evening meal, fasted for 12 hours, and arrived at the study clinic the following morning. Serum glucose, serum insulin, and capillary glucose were measured at 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min, 180 min and 240 min after cookie consumption. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB Services, Aurora, Ontario). All subjects provided informed consent prior to enrolling in the study. Product perception (sensory evaluation and overall liking) was similar between the two treatments. The VERSAFIBE 1490 dietary fiber cookie reduced the post‐prandial serum glucose iAUC 0‐120min by 44% (p = 0.004) and reduced the maximum glucose concentration (C max0‐120min ) by 8% (p = 0.001) versus the control cookie. Consumption of the VERSAFIBE 1490 dietary fiber cookie resulted in a significant 46% reduction of the post‐prandial serum insulin iAUC 0‐120min (p < 0.001) and a 23% reduction in C max0‐120min (p = 0.007) versus the control cookie. There was a 48% reduction in the elevation of post‐prandial capillary glucose iAUC 0‐120min (p < 0.001) and a 9% decrease in C max 0‐120min (p = 0.005) when participants consumed the VERSAFIBE 1490 dietary fiber cookie versus the control cookie. Serum glucose, serum insulin, and capillary glucose values were significantly lower at individual time points when the VERSAFIBE 1490 dietary fiber cookie was consumed versus the control cookie. This study shows that VERSAFIBE 1490 can be incorporated into a cookie and significantly reduce post‐prandial glucose and insulin responses in healthy adults. The consumer perception of the high‐fiber VERSAFIBE 1490 dietary fiber cookie was similar to the low‐fiber control cookie, which demonstrates a practical approach to formulating baked goods with high dietary fiber content. Support or Funding Information This study was funded by Ingredion Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA. Copyright 2016 by Ingredion Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicFood composition and properties→French-language works237,207→