MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effect of Early Market Introduction of Iodized Salt on Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes in a Randomized Clinical Trial in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia

2017· article· en· W4389019580 on OpenAlexaffabout
Husein Mohammed, Grace S. Marquis, Frances E. Aboud, Karim Bougma, Kimberly Harding, Aregash Samuel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsNutrition InternationalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIodised saltMedicinePregnancyIodine deficiencyIodineRandomized controlled trialObstetricsEnvironmental healthPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iodine deficiency has been shown to lead to adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. This study examined the effect of early introduction of iodized salt on pregnancy and birth outcomes in a moderately iodine deficient area. Sixty randomly selected districts across six zones in the Amhara region of Ethiopia were randomly assigned to receive the intervention (early access to iodized salt) or serve as the control (later access through normal market forces). One village each in twenty‐two of the intervention districts and 22 of the control districts was randomly selected for data collection. A total of 1220 pregnant women who conceived after the intervention began were assessed for their iodine and iron status, and their household salt was tested for iodine. Additional data were collected on their household socio‐demographic status and iodized salt, gestational history, adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, and child nutritional status 2 to 13 months old after mothers gave birth. The mothers had an average age of 28 ± 6 y with low education (77% illiteracy), low household assets (42% scored <3 out of 10), and poor water and sanitation (61%). The median maternal urinary iodine concentration was adequate and significantly higher in the intervention communities than that of the controls (163 vs 121 μg/L, p<0.0001). Additionally, fewer pregnant women (28% vs 41%, p<0.05) and their children (13% vs 20%, p=0.06) had urinary iodine less than 50 μg/L in the intervention than control communities. After accounting for the effect of cluster and gestational history, the intervention did not significantly reduce miscarriages (OR (95% CI): 2.5 (0.9, 6.9)), stillbirths (OR (95% Cl): 1.0 (0.4, 2.8)), or infant mortality (OR (95%CI): 0.9 (0.5, 1.6)). Our inability to detect an effect of early access to iodized salt on birth outcomes may be due to (i) higher than expected access to iodized salt among the controls, (ii) lower than expected prevalence of poor birth outcomes, and (iii) inadequate sample size. The intervention improved pregnant women's iodine status and governments should pursue universal salt iodization program for the multiple known benefits. Support or Funding Information Sponsored by Micronutrient Initiative, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMaternal and fetal healthcare→French-language works237,207→