MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effect of Advanced Maternal Age on Cardiovascular Function in Adult Male and Female Rat Offspring

2017· article· en· W4389019806 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Amin Shah, Alison S. Care, Christy Lynn Cooke, Jude S. Morton, Anita Quon, Raven Kirschenman, Sandra T. Davidge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRoyal Alexandra Hospital Foundation
KeywordsOffspringMedicineLitterCardiac function curvePregnancyInternal medicineYoung adultPhysiologyEndocrinologyCardiologyBiologyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnancy in advanced maternal age (< 35 yrs of age) increases the risk of immediate and long‐term health complications in mothers and offspring. Using a rat model of advanced maternal age, we have recently demonstrated poor fetal development, decreased litter size, and impaired maternal vascular function. The present study aimed to investigate the cardiovascular health of adult male and female offspring born to dams of advanced maternal age. Echocardiography and isolated working heart techniques were used to assess in vivo cardiac function and ex vivo cardiac function recovery after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) respectively in 4 month and 12 month adult offspring born to young (4 month) or maternal aged (9.5 month) rat dams. At 4 month of age, ex‐vivo data showed that male offspring from aged dams had significantly decreased cardiac function recovery after I/R compared to offspring from young dams (45.78 ± 9.54% vs. 107.6 ± 4.03%; P< 0.001). In contrast, there was no significant difference in cardiac function recovery after I/R in female offspring born from aged vs young dams (87.6 ± 3.26% vs. 94.79 ± 5.89 %; P=NS); indicating better cardiac tolerance against I/R injury compared to their male counterparts. At 12 month of age, echocardiographic data revealed that compared to offspring from young dams, male offspring from aged dams developed in vivo cardiac diastolic dysfunction as indicated by decreased isovolumic relaxation time (male offspring IVRT; young dam 34.27 ± 2.04 vs. aged dam 27.61 ± 0.99 msec; P< 0.01). In contrast, there was no significant difference in in vivo cardiac function between the groups in female offspring indicating intact in vivo cardiac function. We further evaluated whether aging in the female offspring impacted ex vivo cardiac susceptibility to I/R. Our ex vivo data showed that 12 month old female offspring born from both young and aged dams had a similar basal cardiac power during the pre‐ischemia period and similar percent recovery of cardiac function after I/R injury (female offspring; young dam 102.8 % vs. aged dam 81.08 %, Mann‐Whitney U test: P=NS). In conclusion, aged male offspring born to mothers of advanced maternal age had an increased susceptibility to the development of cardiovascular dysfunction. Support or Funding Information This work is funded by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 133566), the Women and Children's Health Research Institute through the generous contributions of the Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation and the Royal Alexandra Hospital Foundation. A. Shah is supported by fellowship from the Molly Towell Perinatal Research Foundation Canada. S. Davidge is a Canada Research Chair in Maternal and Perinatal Cardiovascular Health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→