MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Troponin degradation products: more specific marker for myocardial infarction

2017· article· en· W4389020140 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Somaya Zahran, Vivian Figueiredo, George Cembrowski, Michelle M. Graham, Richard Schulz, Peter M. Hwang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionTroponin ICardiologyTroponinIschemiaInternal medicineProteasesBiochemistryChemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Myocardial infarction (MI) is the death of cardiac muscle in the setting of severe ischemia (lack of oxygen and nutrient supply). Assay of serum troponin I (TnI) is the biochemical gold standard for detecting MI. With the development of high sensitivity assays, TnI is being detected in milder conditions such as reversible tachycardia or myocardial ischemia in the absence of radiologic evidence for infarct. Different types of MI are classified clinically: type 1 MI being the classic “heart attack” where the irreversible infarct necessitates a timely intervention. In contrast, type 2 MI is precipitated by a physiologic stressor (e.g. tachyarrhythmia, sepsis, or anemia) that causes ischemia in vulnerable regions of the heart. It is very important to differentiate irreversible infarct from reversible ischemia with a novel biomarker because the treatments are very different. Rationale While the mechanisms leading to TnI release are poorly understood, it is generally accepted that intracellular proteases are differentially activated in ischemia and in cell death. Cardiac TnI has intrinsically disordered N‐ and C‐terminal ends that are exposed and vulnerable to proteolytic digestion. TnI proteolysis products may be more rational and specific markers for irreversible cardiomyocyte death than its total level in the blood. Methods We collected blood samples from 29 hospitalised patients with elevated cTnI. We quantitated proteolytic degradation using sandwich ELISAs to specifically detect the N‐terminal, core, or C‐terminal regions of TnI using commercial antibodies (M18, MF4, and 560, respectively). Results We observed a wide variation in the degree of proteolytic degradation of TnI across the patients' samples. Interestingly, degradation of TnI at both N‐ and C‐termini in type 1 MI samples was detected. However, the C‐terminus degradation was more robust, consistent and proportional to the severity of the infarct. On the other hand, there was less degradation observed in type 2 MI samples, indicating that TnI is released in a more intact form. Conclusions Proteolytic degradation of TnI at its C‐terminus is a more specific marker for clinically significant MI than total TnI level. Making a distinction between intact and degraded forms of TnI may be useful for identifying patients with focal infarct in need of urgent revascularization and monitoring intracellular proteolysis as a possible target for therapeutic intervention. Support or Funding Information This work was funded by the University of Alberta Hospital Foundation, CIHR, startup funds from the Department of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry in the University of Alberta, and the Hwang Professional Corporation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207