MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Pre‐Meal Television Viewing and Exercise on Subjective Appetite and Food Intake in Children

2017· article· en· W4389020733 on OpenAlexaff
Julia O. Totosy de Zepetnek, Melissa Da Silva, Kerry Miller, Nick Bellissimo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppetiteMealThirstMedicineFood intakeEnergy expenditureSittingEating behaviorCaloric intakePhysical therapyInternal medicinePsychologyBody weightObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose The effects of pre‐meal television viewing (TVV) and exercise (EXR) on subjective appetite and food intake (FI) regulation are not well understood in the paediatric population. The objective of the present study was to investigate separate and concurrent effects of 30‐min TVV and moderate‐intensity EXR immediately before mealtime on subjective appetite and FI in 9 to 14 year old boys and girls. Methods During four test mornings one week apart and 2 h after a standardized breakfast, 13 children (n=7 boys, n=6 girls; age 11.1 ± 0.5 years) were randomly assigned to one of four 30‐min treatment conditions: TVV only, EXR only, TVV and EXR, and sitting control. Immediately following the treatment, FI was measured via an ad libitum pizza meal. Subjective appetite was assessed at baseline, 15 and 30‐min during the treatment condition, and upon trial completion at 60‐min. Subjective emotions were assessed at baseline and at 30 min. Results FI and water intake were not affected by treatment condition, but after subtracting exercise energy expenditure (EE), there was a main effect of the exercise on FI (p=0.01), which lead to an average ~20% reduction in FI compared to the sedentary conditions (TVV and control). Thirst scores were higher in the exercise vs. sedentary groups at 15‐min (p<0.01) and 30‐min (p<0.001). Subjective average appetite and emotion were not affected by treatment, but increased with time in all conditions (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively). Conclusions Exposure to 30‐min TVV and EXR before eating did not affect subjective emotions, subjective appetite, or FI. TVV alone or concurrent with EXR did not influence FI regulation, suggesting that physiologic signals of satiation and satiety are not overridden by environmental stimuli of pre‐meal screen‐time exposure among young children. Increased EE did not result in compensatory increases in short‐term FI, resulting in a decreased net energy balance during the measurement period. Therefore, moderate‐intensity exercise leading to increased EE, independent of TVV, influences energy balance and may support achieving or maintaining healthy weights in children. Support or Funding Information Faculty of Community Services Seed Grant (Nick Bellissimo), and the Undergraduate Research Award (Melissa Da Silva).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet→French-language works237,207→