Poincare Analysis of Spontaneous Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia during High Altitude Ascent: Effects on oxygenation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is the transient fluctuation in heart rate (HR) in phase with the respiratory cycle. Poincare spectral analysis is used to (a) quantify heart rate variability (HRV) through short term (SD1; i.e., RSA) and long term (SD2) fluctuations in heart rate and (b) determine components of autonomic nervous system activity (low and high frequency; LF and HF; sympathetic and parasympathetic, respectively). Although RSA likely represents the dominance of the parasympathetic nervous system at rest, there is controversy regarding the mechanisms underlying RSA, as well as the possible physiological utility. RSA may improve ventilation and perfusion (V/Q) matching in the lungs, and may protect against oxygen desaturation in the context of hypoxic exposure. We aimed to investigate the relationship between RSA magnitude and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) during incremental ascent to high altitude (4370m). We hypothesized that (a) RSA magnitude (SD1/SD2) ratio would decrease during ascent to high altitude as a result of sympathetic nervous system activation and (b) individuals with a larger SD1/SD2 ratio during ascent would have increased SpO 2 through improved V/Q matching. Measurements were conducted over eleven days at 1045m (baseline, day 1), 3440m (day 7), 3860m (day 9), and 4370m (day 11) during a trek to altitude in the Nepal Himalaya. Participants (26±2.1 years; BMI 23.8±1.1 kg/m 2 ; 9 females, n=12) were instrumented with an ECG and finger pulse oximeter (SpO 2 %) and tested on rest days after one night at each altitude. Spontaneous RSA was measured from the ECG periods during the last 7‐min of a 10‐min baseline and evaluated using Poincare plots. There was no significant difference between the SD1/SD2 ratio during incremental ascent to 4370m (P=0.65). There was also no significant difference observed in the LF/HF ratios during ascent to 4370m (P=0.66), suggesting that the sympathetic/parasympathetic ratio remained unchanged with ascent. Additionally, we correlated SD1/SD2 ratio and SpO 2 at 4370m when individuals were most hypoxic at rest (SpO 2 87.2±0.8%) and found no significant correlation (r=0.32, P=0.31). Our data suggests that during slow incremental ascent to high altitude, there is no difference in spontaneous RSA or the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system activity. Individuals with larger SD1/SD2 ratios do not have improved SpO 2 , suggesting that RSA magnitude does not improve V/Q matching during high altitude ascent. Support or Funding Information Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Student Temporary Employment Program of Alberta, Alberta Innovates Health Solutions Summer Studentship,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".