MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effect of Age on the Cerebrovascular Responses to the Initiation of Dynamic Exercise

2017· article· en· W4389023829 on OpenAlexaffabout
James P. Fisher, Amar Ahmed, Phil N. Ainslie, Anthony R. Bain, Kevin W. Wildfong, Laura Morris, Daniela Flück

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTranscranial DopplerMiddle cerebral arteryCardiologyBlood pressureCardiac outputHemodynamicsInternal medicineDiastoleVascular resistanceCerebral perfusion pressureCerebral blood flowIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid hemodynamic changes induced by the initiation of dynamic exercise robustly challenge the regulatory processes which ensure that cerebral perfusion is appropriately maintained. We sought to determine whether age alters the cerebrovascular responses to the initiation of dynamic exercise. Ten young (mean±SD, 23±2 years, 2 women) and eight older (65±3 years, 1 women) individuals performed a 5‐minute bout of semi‐recumbent leg cycling exercise at 75W. Blood pressure, cardiac output, total peripheral resistance (Finometer) and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv: transcranial Doppler ultrasound) were monitored. Gosling pulsatility index (PI) was calculated as; (systolic MCAv–diastolic MCAv)/mean MCAv. Beat‐to‐beat data during exercise were linearly interpolated at 1 Hz. At baseline, MAP (mean±SEM, young, 87±3; older, 93±4 mmHg), MCAv (young, 57±2; older, 56±3 cm/s) and PI (young, 0.88±0.4; older, 0.92±0.4 cm/s) were not different in young and older groups (P>0.05), while TPR tended to be lower (young, 16±1; older, 21±2 mmHg/L·min −1 , p=0.08) and CO tended to be higher (young, 5.6±0.4; older, 4.6±4 L·min −1 ; p=0.13) in the young. The initiation of exercise evoked a rapid and sustained increase in cardiac output and fall in total peripheral resistance, that was blunted in the older group. Blood pressure fell transiently at exercise onset, reaching a similar nadir (young, −9.9±2.8; older, −10.0±2.9 mmHg; p>0.05) after a similar duration (15±2; older, 13±2 s; p>0.05) in both groups. MCAv also fell transiently at the initiation of exercise (young, −5.3±1.5; older, −5.1±1.9 cm/s, p>0.05), but the nadir was reached later in the older group (young, 20±2; older, 29±2 s, p<0.05). PI increased rapidly at the onset of exercise in young individuals, but was elevated more sluggishly in older individuals. Collectively, these findings suggest that older individuals exhibit delayed cerebrovascular adjustments at the onset of exercise. Support or Funding Information This research was supported by a National Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant and Canadian Research Chair in Cerebrovascular Physiology (PNA), the Swiss National Science Foundation (DF) and the British Heart Foundation (JPF).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention→French-language works237,207→