MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact of Bradykinin B1 Receptor Blockade on Angiotensin II‐Induced Cardiac and Aortic Remodeling

2017· article· en· W4389023833 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brittney A. McCormick, Julie‐Émilie Huot‐Marchand, Denis deBlois, Taben M. Hale

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineAngiotensin IIBradykininAortaEndocrinologyMuscle hypertrophyMedicineBlood pressureReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiotensin II (AngII) is a growth factor known to induce vascular and cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. AngII has been shown to regulate bradykinin B1 receptor (B1R) expression in the heart and aorta and we have recently shown that concomitant B1R antagonism could prevent AngII‐induced cardiac fibrosis. The present study investigated the impact of AngII and bradykinin B1R antagonism on blood pressure and left ventricular (LV) and aortic hypertrophy. Male Sprague‐Dawley rats were treated for 4 weeks with vehicle or AngII (200 ng/kg per min) in the presence or absence of the B1R antagonist R‐954 (400 μg/kg per day). In addition, bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was infused to assess cellular proliferation. At sacrifice, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was assessed via carotid artery cannulation in anesthetized rats. The LV and aorta were weighed, and the aortic and cardiomyocyte cross sectional area (CSA) were measured. Additionally, LV DNA content was determined and aortic cellular proliferation was assessed via immunohistochemistry to measure BrdU incorporation. Relative to vehicle, AngII increased MAP (59%), aortic cell proliferation (144%), and aortic CSA (34%), ‐ effects that were not offset by B1R antagonism. However, B1R antagonism did attenuate the AngII‐induced increase in aortic mass. Similarly, AngII increased LV hypertrophy (35%) and total DNA content (44%) relative to control, both of which were prevented by concomitant B1R antagonism. Cardiomyocyte CSA was not different across treatment groups. This study reveals tissue‐specific effects of bradykinin B1R antagonism. Although AngII induced significant remodeling in both the heart and aorta, concomitant B1R blockade only prevented cell accumulation and remodeling in the LV. Future studies will investigate the mechanism underlying this effect to further elucidate the role of the bradykinin B1R and its interaction with AngII in remodeling heart and aorta. Support or Funding Information Canadian Male Sexual Health Council

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema→French-language works237,207→