MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Omics approaches for discovery of natural anti‐aging and anti‐cancer compounds and defining mechanisms of their action

2016· article· en· W4389024351 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vladimir I. Titorenko, Anna Leonov, Anthony Arlia‐Ciommo, Younes Medkour, Veronika Svistkova

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalorie restrictionBiologyMitochondrionCell biologyMetabolomicsLongevityLipidomicsNutrient sensingLipid metabolismBiochemistrySignal transductionBioinformaticsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Caloric restriction (CR) and dietary restriction (DR) extend lifespan across species and improve health by delaying the onset of age‐related diseases. All currently known anti‐aging chemical compounds (1) mimic lifespan‐extending and health‐improving effects of CR and DR without restricting caloric and nutrient intake; and (2) target signaling pathways that are under the stringent control of calorie and/or nutrient availability. It was believed therefore that all longevity pathways are “adaptable” by nature because they modulate longevity only in response to certain changes in the extracellular and intracellular nutrient and energy status of an organism. However, it is possible that that some longevity pathways could be “constitutive” or “housekeeping” because they control longevity irrespective of calorie and/or nutrient availability. We designed a high‐throughput chemical genetic screen for compounds that increase the lifespan of yeast under CR by modulating such housekeeping pathways. Our screen identified lithocholic acid (LCA) as one of them. Using proteomics, lipidomics, metabolomics and cell biological approaches, we found that LCA delays aging by: (1) remodeling lipid metabolism in the endoplasmic reticulum, lipid droplets and peroxisomes ‐ thereby preventing liponecrotic programmed cell death caused by the age‐related accumulation of fatty acids; (2) remodeling the repertoire of mitochondrial membrane lipids ‐ thereby reducing the number of mitochondria, increasing their size, expanding their cristae, elevating the abundance of respiratory supercomplexes in the inner mitochondrial membrane, and altering the age‐related dynamics of changes in mitochondrial respiration, membrane potential and reactive oxygen species; (3) attenuating age‐related mitochondrial fragmentation ‐ thereby suppressing mitochondria‐controlled apoptosis; and (4) promoting “mitohormesis” through the activation of several stress response‐related processes in mitochondria. Our findings also imply that, in addition to its robust anti‐aging effect, LCA exhibits a potent and selective anti‐tumor effect in cultured human neuroblastoma, glioma, breast cancer and prostate cancer cells by activating both the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptotic death. Support or Funding Information Supported by NSERC of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms→French-language works237,207→