MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reseeding Decellularized Porcine Ventricular Extracellular Matrix with Isolated Primary Human Atrial Cells

2016· article· en· W4389024413 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alison Müller, Alois Haromy, Darren H. Freed

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecellularizationExtracellular matrixCollagenaseStem cellFibronectinTissue engineeringChemistryExtracellularProgenitor cellCell biologyBiomedical engineeringPathologyBiologyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a result of pioneering research unveiling the influence of extracellular environment in determining stem/progenitor cell differentiation, a myriad of cellular scaffolds have been developed in order to optimize the delivery of these cells in a diseased environment as a technique to improve their efficacy in stem cell therapy. Although a variety of scaffolds are being studied in different contexts, the most physiologically relevant ones are those that most closely resemble the environment to be treated. Our lab has a keen interest in cardiovascular disease and has recently optimized a technique that decellularizes and reseeds isolated sections of healthy porcine ventricular tissue with primary human atrial cells. Decellularization involved a multi‐step, multi‐reagent washing process over a period of four days, after which confirmation of a lack of cells was determined by DAPI staining and subsequent western blotting looking for the absence of β‐tubulin. After decellularization, our objective was to successfully seed the decellularized tissue slices via co‐incubation of isolated primary human atrial fibroblasts (hAFs) or human c‐kit (+) cardiac progenitor cells (hCCs). These two cell types were chosen to compare how hAFs and hCCs respond differently to healthy extracellular matrix (ECM). Cells were isolated from the atrial appendage of patients undergoing open heart surgery by mincing followed by collagenase digestion and subsequent isolation of hCCs was performed using a c‐kit (+) magnetic bead isolation procedure. HAFs and hCCs were incubated separately on sections of decellularized porcine ventricular ECM over a period of 24 hours and then visualized using immunofluoresence. Collagen‐1, fibronectin, and versican antibodies were used to image the ECM structure and DAPI was used to identify cells embedded in the recellularized matrix. Successful seeding of cells was also evaluated by western blot detection of β‐tubulin in samples not prepared for immunofluorescence. In conclusion, our technique was successful in reseeding decellularized porcine ventricular extracellular matrix and can be extrapolated to detect other proteins in these tissues without having to reseed an entire decellularized heart. This can be used to compare differences among cell types and their responses between healthy and damaged or diseased cardiac ECM among different hearts or even within the same heart. Support or Funding Information Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute University of Alberta Hospital Foundation Alberta Innovates Health Solutions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207