Sweating During Intermittent Exercise in the Heat in Young and Older Adults: A Role for P2 Receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent findings have identified nitric oxide synthase (NOS) as an important modulator of sweating during exercise. Additionally, in vitro studies have identified the presence of P2 receptors (a subgroup of purinergic receptors) on human eccrine sweat glands, which may indicate that these receptors can modulate sweating. If so, these receptors may influence sweating through NOS‐dependent mechanisms, given that P2 receptor activation can increase calcium ion concentration, which in turn can activate NOS. Studies also demonstrate that NOS‐dependent sweating is impaired in older adults during exercise in the heat. In parallel, P2 receptors are down regulated in older adults, suggesting the contribution of P2 receptors, if any, to sweating may also be impaired. Thus, we assessed the separate and combined contribution of NOS and P2 receptors to the sweating response during exercise in the heat. Additionally, we evaluated whether ageing influences these responses. Eight young (24±4 years) and nine older (57±6 years) adults performed an intermittent cycling protocol consisting of two 30 min bouts of exercise (Ex) at a fixed rate of heat production of 400 W in the heat (35°C); followed by 20 and 40 min of recovery respectively. Sweat rate (ventilated capsule) was monitored at four forearm skin sites continuously perfused via intradermal microdialysis: 1) lactated Ringer (Control), 2) 10 mM N G ‐nitro‐ L ‐arginine methyl ester ( L ‐NAME, a non‐selective NOS inhibitor), 3) 100 mM pyridoxine (PDX, non‐selective P2 receptor blocker), or 4) a combination of PDX and L ‐NAME. We show that in young adults, administration of L ‐NAME attenuated sweat rate (Ex1: 0.65 mg min −1 cm −2 ; Ex2: 0.67 mg min −1 cm −2 ) in comparison to Control (Ex1: 0.79 mg min −1 cm −2 ; Ex2: 0.82 mg min −1 cm −2 ) at the end of both exercise bouts (both P≤0.05). Further, infusion of PDX, both independently (Ex1: 0.69 mg min −1 cm −2 , P=0.07; Ex2: 0.73 mg min −1 cm −2 , P=0.04) and in combination with L ‐NAME (Ex1: 0.69 mg min −1 cm −2 , P=0.04; Ex2: 0.74 mg min −1 cm −2 , P=0.09), tended to reduce sweat rate relative to Control; albeit, these responses were not all statistically significant. However, the magnitude of reduction at each site compared to Control were not different (P=0.32). Finally, no differences in local sweat rate were observed between treatment sites in older adults (P=0.20). In summary, our findings indicate that P2 receptor activation can contribute to sweating in young adults through a NOS‐dependent mechanism. However, the contribution of these pathways to the sweating response is diminished in older adults. Support or Funding Information Funding support: This study was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discover grant, RGPIN‐06313‐2014; Discovery Grants Program ‐ Accelerator Supplement, RGPAS‐462252‐2014; funds held by Dr. Glen P. Kenny).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".