MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Human growth gene family chromosomal architecture is affected by maternal obesity, gestational diabetes and insulin treatment

2016· article· en· W4389024517 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yan Jin, Hana Vakili, Savas Menticoglou, Peter A. Cattini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyInsulin resistanceLocus (genetics)ChromatinGestational diabetesChromatin immunoprecipitationGeneGene expressionInsulinPromoterPregnancyGeneticsGestationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human placental chorionic somatomammotropin (CS) ‐A and B, and growth hormone variant (GH‐V) are placental members of the human (h) growth hormone (GH) gene family. These genes are located at a single locus on chromosome 17 in tandem with the pituitary hGH gene (GH‐N). CS and GH‐V stimulate pancreatic β‐cells in the response to ‘normal’ pregnancy induced insulin resistance. Maternal obesity exacerbates this ‘resistance’ and decreases CS/GH‐V gene expression, increasing the risk for gestational diabetes (GDM). Looping together of hGH‐N promoter and remote (14.5–32 kilobases) upstream hGH/CS locus control region (LCR) sequences is essential for efficient gene expression in vivo . Recently, hGH‐N chromatin looping and gene expression were shown to be negatively affected by excess caloric intake. Thus, we have compared the effect of maternal obesity (BMI >35 kg/m 2 ) without or with the further complication of GDM and insulin treatment on the chromatin structure and expression of the hCS/GH‐V gene locus in pregnancy. Human CS‐A RNA was decreased with maternal obesity but increased to levels detected in placentas from obese women with insulin treatment. Chromatin conformation capture (3C) assay was used to assess the long‐range interaction between the remote LCR sequences that include three nuclease hypersensitive sites (HS III–V) in human placental syncytiotrophoblasts, with and more proximal regulatory sequences linked to CS/GH‐V gene expression. Recruitment of RNA polymerase II at the promoter regions was also assessed as an indication of transcriptional status by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Physical interactions between remote LCR and local regulatory regions of the CS genes, suggesting looping of intervening sequences, were detected in lean woman, but were disrupted by maternal obesity. The same disrupted chromosomal conformation was not seen in obese diabetic pregnant women treated with insulin. However, although evidence of chromatin looping involving LCR and local regulatory sequences was apparent, the pattern was distinct when compared to lean placental samples. Maternal obesity was associated with significant decreases in RNA polymerase II occupancy at the promoter regions. Insulin treatment in obese women with a diabetic condition, however, significantly muted the decrease in RNA polymerase II occupancy at the CS/GH‐V promoter regions, presumably reflecting the looping of regulatory regions that was observed. Thus, insulin treatment of obese women with GDM results in overall CS/GH‐V RNA levels comparable to those seen in lean women. Recovery of the CS transcript levels, however, does not correlate with the preservation of the three dimensional chromosomal structure of the placental GH gene locus as defined in normal pregnancies. These data suggest a vulnerability of the hGH/CS gene locus chromatin structure and genes to excess caloric intake in pregnancy but also some plasticity in terms of response. Support or Funding Information Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207