MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

MRP4 Influences cAMP Levels in Ciliary Epithelial cells of the Human Eye

2017· article· en· W4389024615 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ryan M. Pelis, Leslie Ingraham, Adam Hotchkiss

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExtracellularIntracellularAdenosineCiliary bodyCell biologyBiologyReceptorCyclic adenosine monophosphateCiliumEpitheliumSignal transductionMolecular biologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ciliary epithelium is important for aqueous humor inflow and maintenance of intraocular pressure. Treatment of ciliary epithelium with β‐adrenergic agonists leads to increased extracellular cAMP and adenosine and stimulation of aqueous humor inflow. The mechanism by which cAMP gets out ciliary epithelial cells is unknown. The purpose was to determine if the multidrug resistance‐associated protein 4 (MRP4) in ciliary epithelial cells influences intracellular and extracellular cAMP levels. Intracellular and extracellular cAMP levels were monitored in cultured ciliary epithelial cells using a FRET‐based assay. Also examined by RT‐PCR in cultured cells and native human ciliary body was the expression of MRP4, and the expression of receptors and enzymes associated with the cAMP‐adenosine signaling pathway. MRP4 mRNA and protein (immunoblotting) were detected in cultured cells and native human ciliary body. There was a dose‐dependent increase in both intracellular and extracellular cAMP levels following treatment of the cells with isoproterenol (ISO, 0–1 mM). Intracellular cAMP levels were ~10‐fold higher in the presence vs. absence of ISO (1 mM), and extracellular cAMP went from being undetectable to detectable. The β2‐adrenergic receptor was detected in the cultured cells and native ciliary body, but β1‐ and β3‐adrenergic receptors were undetectable. MRP4 mRNA was undetectable by qPCR and RT‐PCR in cultured cells following treatment with siRNA against MRP4. There was no difference in basal intracellular cAMP levels between cells treated with negative control siRNA (control) and MRP4 siRNA. Following treatment with ISO (1 mM) intracellular cAMP levels were 2.7‐fold significantly higher in cells treated with MRP4 siRNA compared to control. There was no difference in extracellular cAMP levels between the two treatments. Also present in both cultured cells and native ciliary body were message for enzymes necessary for conversion of cAMP to adenosine, such as ecto‐5‐nucleotidase (CD73). These data show that MRP4 likely contributes to efflux of cAMP from ciliary epithelial cells where it is then converted to adenosine. The cultured cells should prove useful for further study of the cAMP‐adenosine signaling pathway in the ciliary epithelium of the human eye. Support or Funding Information Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→