MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Atrial Arrhythmia and Autonomics in an Intermittent Hypoxia Rat Model of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

2016· article· en· W4389024690 on OpenAlexaffabout
Douglas L. Jones, S Bober, John Ciriello

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObstructive sleep apneaAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineEffective refractory periodCarbacholElectrophysiologyIntermittent hypoxiaAnesthesiaCardiologyHypoxia (environmental)Intracardiac injectionAtropineStimulationApneaAtrium (architecture)EndocrinologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for developing atrial fibrillation (AF), but the mechanisms underlying AF are unknown. OSA is characterized by airway obstruction and intermittent hypoxia (IH), which has been implicated in the induction of cardiovascular dysfunction. However, the role of IH in predisposing the atria to AF is not understood. Hypothesis This study tested the hypothesis that chronic repetitive IH enhances autonomic responses, and predisposes the atria to AF. Materials and Methods Adult, male Sprague‐Dawley rats were exposed to normoxia or repeated cycles of 120 s 21% O 2 alternated with 80 s 6.5–8% O 2 for 8h/day for 7 days. Rats exposed to 7 days of IH or normoxia had in vivo intracardiac electrophysiology studies to evaluate electrophysiological characteristics and susceptibility to electrical inducibility of AF. Atrial effective refractory periods were determined using programmed electrical stimulation (PES) at two atrial locations. Susceptibility to electrically induced AF was determined using PES with 8 stimuli at basic drive cycle lengths of 150 or 100 ms followed by a sequentially premature single extrastimumus and burst pacing using up to 30, 1 sec burst at 50 Hz. Results Rats following 7‐days of IH exposure were more susceptible to electrical induction of atrial arrhythmia than normoxic controls (50% vs 0%, respectively, P < 0.05). This was accompanied by an increase in inducibility in the presence of carbachol which was blocked by atropine and darifenacin. The response to isoproterenol were enhanced in the normoxic but not in the IH rats, and the effects of propranolol were less pronounced in the IH rats. Conclusions We have demonstrated for the first time that repeated exposure to IH in rats produced enhanced sensitivity to atrial arrhythmias. These novel findings implicating IH as a critical promoter of AF in an OSA model. Accentuation with cholinergic agonists and blockade with nonspecific and M3 specific antagonists is consistent with sensitivity to parasympathetic activation which is known to predispose the atria to AF. The diminished response to sympathetic agents suggests a potential desensitization to adrenergic activation in the IH rats. These novel findings provide an indication of the importance of IH in OSA and susceptibility to atrial arrhythmia and potential for novel therapies in OSA. Support or Funding Information Supported in part by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research→French-language works237,207→