MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cells lining the lateral ventricle show dynamic protein expression following tail loss in the leopard gecko

2016· article· en· W4389024779 on OpenAlexafffund
Rebecca McDonald, Emily Gilbert, Alaina Macdonald, Matthew K. Vickaryous

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologySOX2Progenitor cellDentate gyrusPopulationCell biologyNeurogenesisNeural stem cellCentral nervous systemStem cellNeurosciencePathologyAnatomyMedicineTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neural stem progenitor cells (NSPCs) have been identified in the adult mammalian central nervous system, specifically in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus and in the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricle. Despite this, mammals are incapable of central nervous system regeneration following injury. In contrast, many lizard species can regenerate their spinal cord (following tail loss) and some can even repair the optic nerve and parts of the brain. However, the source of cells contributing to brain regeneration remains unclear. Here we characterize cells lining the lateral ventricle of the brain in the leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius. We show that these ventricular lining, or periventricular cells are a potential progenitor population capable of responding to central nervous system injury. Using a bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse‐chase experiment we determined that, prior to injury, periventricular cells are slow‐cycling. Moreover, periventricular cells show widespread expression of several common NSPC markers, including the transcription factor Sox2 and the intermediate filament glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). In addition, a subset of periventricular cells express the neural progenitor cell marker Sox9. Following injury to the spinal cord (as a result of tail loss) populations of periventricular cells lining the lateral ventricle continue to express NSPC markers but also begin to proliferate, as evidenced by expression of both proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and phosphohistone H3. Intriguingly, some of these cells newly express HuC/D, a marker of neuronal differentiation. Dynamic protein expression by periventricular cells indicates that this population is activated in response to injury, and points towards their potential to participate in neural regeneration. Support or Funding Information Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant 400358

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research→French-language works237,207→