MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Giardia muris</i> Protection against <i>Citrobacter rodentium C</i> olitis is Associated with Inflammasome Activation and Increased Release of Antimicrobial Peptides in the Gut

2016· article· en· W4389024910 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Anna Mańko, Jean‐Paul Motta, James A. Cotton, Ayodele Oyeyemi, Bruce A. Vallance, John L. Wallace, André G. Buret

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCitrobacter rodentiumMicrobiologyGiardiaBiologyLamina propriaDiarrheaInflammasomeShigella flexneriIntestinal mucosaMyeloperoxidaseColitisImmunologyInflammationPathogenMedicineEpitheliumPathologyEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Polymicrobial gastrointestinal (GI) infections are common in individuals living in areas with poor sanitation. In areas where Giardia sp. infections are found in association with enteropathogens causing diarrhea via gut inflammation, Giardia sp. appears to protect against diarrhea via mechanisms that remain unlcear. Intestinal epithelial anti‐microbial peptides (AMPs) and the canonical and non‐canonical inflammasome pathways are essential to host defense. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine whether Giardia muris infection may protect against C itrobacter rodentium colitis, and whether this involves inflammasome activation and/or enhanced AMP production. Methods Male C57BL/6 mice were co‐infected with G. muris trophozoites and GFP‐labeled C. rodentium . Animals were assessed for weight gain, fecal blood, histopathology, myeloperoxidase (MPO) assays, bacterial loads, immunofluorescence for microbial‐tissue interactions, as well as Western blotting and qPCR for caspase‐1 and ‐11 (markers of inflammasome activation), β‐Defensin‐2 and Trefoil‐Factor (TFF) 3. Results At 14 days post‐infection, mice infected with C. rodentium had increased macroscopic damage in colon, lost weight and rectal bleeding; G. muris co‐infection significantly inhibited these effects. Microscopic damage score and MPO levels were reduced in co‐infected animals at 14 days post‐infection. In the colon of C. rodentium ‐infected mice, we observed attachment of bacteria to the intestinal epithelium and translocation into the lamina propria. In Giardia co‐infected animals, mucosal adhesion and translocation of C. rodentium was reduced and associated with lower tissue C. rodentium counts. Colonic caspase‐1 and ‐11 protein levels were increased in the co‐infected group compared to animals given C. rodentium alone. In colonic tissues of mice co‐infected with G. muris , mRNA and protein levels of the AMPs β‐Defensin‐2 and TFF3 proteins were significantly increased compared to animals given C. rodentium alone. Immunofluorescence of colonic tissues revealed increased intensity of TFF3 and β‐Defensin‐2 in co‐infected animals, particularly in the lumen and intestinal epithelium. Conclusion The data indicate that G. muris infection protects against C. rodentium‐ ‐induced colitis, in association with upregulation of intestinal AMPs and activation of inflammasome pathways. Our data shed new light on how microbial‐microbial interactions may protect against bacterial enteritis in zones endemic for giardiasis. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicParasitic Infections and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207