MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Feeding a Maternal Diet Enriched in Docosahexaenoic Acid to Lactating Dams Improves the Ex Vivo Tolerance Response to Egg Protein in Suckled Pups

2016· article· en· W4389026367 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Caroline Richard, Erin D. Lewis, Suzan Goruk, Catherine J. Field

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDocosahexaenoic acidBiologyEicosapentaenoic acidLactationEndocrinologyInternal medicineOvalbuminImmune systemOffspringArachidonic acidFatty acidPolyunsaturated fatty acidBiochemistryImmunologyMedicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important T cell mediated process that occurs early in life is the development of oral tolerance (OT). Food allergies are believed to be the result of a failure to develop OT to a dietary antigen. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of feeding a maternal diet supplemented with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) while containing adequate amounts of arachidonic acid (AA) during the suckling period on the development of the immune system and OT in offspring. Sprague‐Dawley dams were randomized to one of the two nutritionally adequate experimental diets 24–48h prior to parturition: control diet (N=12, 0.4% AA and 0% DHA of total fatty acids) or high DHA diet (N=8, 0.4% AA and 0.9% DHA of total fatty acids). Diets were fed to dams ad libitum throughout the suckling period (21 days) and matched for macronutrient, micronutrient and fatty acid content differing only in the composition of omega‐3. At 14‐days pups from each dam were randomly assigned to a mucosal OT challenge for 5 days: placebo (sucrose) or ovalbumin (OVA). At 3 weeks, pups were euthanized and immune cell phenotypes and cytokine production by mitogen‐ (Concanavalin A (ConA), lipopolysaccharide (LPS)) or OVA‐stimulated splenocytes were measured by direct immunofluorescence assay and ELISA, respectively. Feeding dams a high DHA diet increased the proportion of DHA and AA found in breast milk vs. the control diet (both P <0.01). Regardless of the OT challenge, feeding a high DHA diet led to a higher production of interferon‐γ by splenocytes stimulated with ConA and a higher production of interleukin (IL)‐6, IL‐10 and tumor necrosis factor‐α after LPS stimulation (all P <0.05). OVA‐stimulated splenocytes from suckled pups fed the high DHA diet produced significantly more IL‐10 and less transforming growth factor‐β compared to the control diet (both P <0.02), suggestive of better OT. The OT challenge with OVA resulted in a lower production of IL‐6 by LPS‐stimulated splenocytes and led to a higher proportion of cytotoxic T cells expressing CD28 and total cells expressing CD27 (all P <0.02) compared to non‐tolerized pups. Our results suggest that feeding a maternal diet enriched in DHA during the suckling period improves the ability of splenocytes to respond ex vivo to mitogens and the tolerance response to a dietary antigen. Irrespective of the suckling diet, pups who had been orally tolerized to OVA had a lower response to a bacterial antigen despite the presence of more activated T cells and memory immune cells. Support or Funding Information Supported from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. CR holds a scholarship from Canadian Institutes for Health Research and Fonds de recherche en santé du Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicFatty Acid Research and Health→French-language works237,207→