MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Specialist Program in Pathobiology: An undergraduate program in mechanisms of disease

2016· article· en· W4389026407 on OpenAlexaffabout
Avrum I. Gotlieb, Douglas M. Templeton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumMedical educationPopulationGraduate studentsMedicineReading (process)PsychologyPedagogyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A specialist undergraduate program was developed in Pathobiology at the University of Toronto in order to teach current concepts in mechanisms of disease to students selected from a large undergraduate life science student population in the Faculty of Arts and Science. The goal of the program was not to train laboratory professionals or to be a pre‐med course. New faculty appointments supported by the university provost, Faculty of Medicine and department were required. The faculty of the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology was expanded to include a faculty of both basic and clinical scientists who were able to teach a unique curriculum consisting of one full and ten half courses on diverse topics in pathobiology, including cardiovascular pathobiology, neurodegenerative disease, cancer, inflammation, and immunopathology. Following foundation courses in the various life sciences in second year of the Arts and Science curriculum, the Pathobiology courses are introduced in third and fourth year. The courses are small with no more than 30 students in a class which permits more discussion and opportunities for mentoring of students. Students are given didactic lectures and prepare reports and grant applications focused on topics in pathobiology. Reading the current literature on pathogenesis of disease is required. There are hands‐on research opportunities through project course work and twelve‐week summer student placements in graduate faculty research laboratories where students are supervised by faculty, interact with graduate students and carry out a project which they report upon in poster format. Many students utilized these opportunities to select labs for graduate studies. Fourteen classes of Hons. B.Sc. students have graduated from the program. Outcomes were tracked for students graduating between 2007 and 2012 and outcomes for 99 students (70% of available graduates) were determined for the year following graduation. Of these, 52 went to medical school (including three into MD/PhD programs), 31 to graduate life sciences research, 10 to other health care‐related pursuits (e.g., pharmacy, public health), and six to other non‐medical careers. Two former students are currently residents in anatomic pathology. The undergraduate specialist (honours) program in Pathobiology requires a dedicated research faculty who are able to teach at the intersection of basic pathobiology and clinical disease and provides students with an excellent background and preparation for careers in basic discovery and clinical biomedical research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicHealth and Medical Research Impacts→French-language works237,207→