Offspring immune development is dependent on the amount and form of choline in the maternal diet during suckling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exogenous choline needs increase in the postnatal period to meet infant development demands. There is limited knowledge on choline intake during lactation or the role of different choline forms. We developed a database for the choline content of foods and estimated intake in the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition cohort. During lactation, 90% of women (n=1000) consumed below the DRI, with phosphatidylcholine (PC) and free choline comprising ~65% of total choline. In the early postnatal period, the immune system undergoes rapid development and requires a choline supply. The importance of the contribution of dietary choline to immune development during this period has not been explored. In a rodent model, the study objectives were to determine the effect of 1) dietary choline deficiency and 2) the 2 major forms of dietary choline (PC vs. free choline), on parameters of immune development and function in suckled offspring. At parturition, dams were randomized to either: 0 g/kg choline (D; n=7), 1.0 g/kg choline as free choline (C; n=15) or 1.0 g/kg choline as PC (PC; n=5). Diets were nutritionally complete, isocaloric, with similar fatty acid composition. At 3 wks, spleen immune cell phenotypes (by 4‐colour flow cytometry) and ex vivo cytokine production (by ELISA) after Concanavalin A (ConA), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or CD3/CD28 (T cell antigen) stimulation was measured. Stomach content (representing breast milk), plasma and spleen choline content was measured by liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (LC‐MS). D pups had lower body and organ weight, splenocyte number and total choline in stomach compared to C pups (P<0.05). D pups had a higher proportion of helper T cells expressing activation (CD71) and co‐stimulation (CD28) markers and lower proportion of total B cells (CD45RA+) compared to C pups. D pups produced less IFN‐γ (CD3/CD28 stimulation) and less IL‐1β (LPS stimulation). Compared to C pups, splenocytes from PC pups had a lower proportion of antigen presenting cells (OX12+, OX6+, CD68+/CD11b/c+ cells) but produced more IL‐2, IFN‐g and IL‐6 (ConA stimulation), and more IL‐6 and TNF‐α (LPS stimulation). Choline form (fed at 1g/kg) did not alter growth, splenocyte number or total choline in stomach. However, PC pups had a higher proportion of choline as lysoPC and lower proportion as free choline (P<0.05). PC pups had a higher concentration of PC in plasma and splenocyte phospholipids compared to C pups, later confirmed in an in vitro study that may explain the functional differences between choline forms. Our studies suggest choline is essential in the maternal diet during suckling for offspring immune development and providing choline as PC, compared to free choline, promoted maturation and improved immune function. Together with our findings of possible suboptimal intake in lactating women, future research should focus on identifying potential benefits of increasing both total and PC sources of choline in the maternal diet to support immune development in the infant. Support or Funding Information Supported by NSERC, Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency and Alberta Innovates Biosolutions. EDL holds an Izaak Walton Killam Memorial and NSERC Postgraduate Doctoral Scholarships
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".