MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Decreased Systemic Microvascular Function May Contribute to Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Women with Asthma

2016· article· en· W4389026587 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karishma Kapoor, Linn E. Moore, Bradley W. Byers, Michael K. Stickland

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineArterial stiffnessReactive hyperemiaAsthmaPulse wave velocitySupine positionCardiologyInternal medicineEndothelial dysfunctionBlood flowBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Individuals with asthma are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD), with the greatest risk being reported among asthmatic women. The mechanisms underlying differences in CVD risk between sexes are presently unknown. However, endothelial and microvascular dysfunction, and elevated arterial stiffness are early indicators of CVD development and have been shown to be predictive of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine markers of vascular health and thus, CVD risk in men and women with asthma. METHODS Thirteen male (27.9±6.3 years) and eleven female asthmatics (24.7±4.7 years), matched for BMI, were recruited for the study and screened for known cardiovascular conditions. Participants were required to fast and refrain from drinking alcohol, exercising, and using a bronchodilator for 12 hours prior to testing. Endothelial function was assessed by flow‐mediated dilation normalized to shear stress (FMD/SS). Microvascular function was evaluated as hyperemic blood flow (Velocity Time Integral, VTI; cm/s) and arterial stiffness as carotid and radial pulse wave velocity (PWV; m/s). All measurements were done in the supine position following 10 minutes of rest. Two‐tailed Student's t‐tests were used to for statistical comparison between males and females. RESULTS No between‐group differences were seen in endothelial function (female: 0.054±0.009; male: 0.058±0.047, p =0.820), or arterial stiffness (7.8±1.5; 8.8±1.3 m/s, p =0.115). However, women had reduced microvascular function, evaluated as reactive hyperemic blood flow, in comparison to men (74.7±17.4; 96.7±28.2 cm/s, p= 0.035). CONCLUSIONS Asthmatic women have reduced microvascular function compared to asthmatic men, which may be a contributing factor to the increased risk of CVD seen among women with asthma. Support or Funding Information The Lung Association, Alberta & North West Territories (NWT)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207