Immunoelectron Microscopy of Endocytosis and Junction Proteins at Tubulobulbar Complexes in the Mammalian Testis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The seminiferous epithelium is the site of spermatogenesis, the cellular basis for male fertility. Large junction complexes separate the epithelium into basal and adluminal compartments, as well as attach morphologically differentiating spermatids to apical regions of Sertoli cells. During spermatogenesis, turnover of these large junction complexes enables both the next generation of spermatogenic cells to move from the basal into adluminal regions of the epithelium, and mature spermatozoa to be released into the duct system of the reproductive tract. We have proposed that unique structures termed tubulobulbar complexes (TBCs) are subcellular clathrin‐based endocytosis machines that internalize intact intercellular junctions during spermatid translocation and sperm release. If this is true, then proteins associated with endocytosis in general should be associated with TBCs. Previous immunofluorescence results have indicated that Rab5 and EEA1, together with junction proteins, are present in areas occupied by TBCs. However, association with specific compartments of TBCs at the ultrastructural level has not been done. Conventional methods of immunoelectron microscopy do not provide adequate preservation of membranes to clearly localize these proteins to TBCs. We have applied a recently published pre‐embedding protocol (Melo et al. 2014, Nature Protocols 9:2382‐2394) to the rat testis and show that Rab5 associates with the bulb region of TBCs. EEA1 is associated mainly with regions after the bulbs have been internalized. Nectin‐2 associates with junctions and with TBCs. This data supports the hypothesis that TBCs are involved with endocytosis of junction proteins. Support or Funding Information NSERC Discovery Grant to A. Wayne Vogl
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".