MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Unbuckling the Buccal oscillator in the American Bullfrog

2016· article· en· W4389027052 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mufaddal I. Baghdadwala, William M. Trask, Richard J. A. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsOntario Brain Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuccal administrationBrainstemAnatomyNeuropilBiologyNeuroscienceBullfrogCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American Bullfrog is a remarkable model organism to study rhythm generation underlying breathing. It exhibits a breathing pattern that can be divided into four distinct ventilatory phases: lung‐priming, lung‐powerstroke, buccal‐dilation, and buccal‐constriction. We recently established that lung‐priming and lung‐powerstroke are generated by two separate burst generating substrates in the brainstem—the Priming area and Powerstroke area—located in rhombomere 4–5. The neural origin of the two phases of buccal, on the other hand, remains elusive. Our previous experiments suggest that a Buccal area located in rhombomere 7 is responsible, at least in part, for generating the biphasic buccal rhythm; however, whether any additional burst generating substrates are involved is yet unknown. The objective of this study was to characterize areas in the frog brainstem that generate the biphasic buccal rhythm. We utilized the isolated frog brainstem preparation and recorded fictive respiratory motor output from the trigeminal and facial cranial nerves using extracellular suction electrodes. We progressively transected the brainstem in both directions (caudal‐to‐rostral, and rostral‐to‐caudal) to identify regions where transection eliminated one or both buccal burst phases. Our preliminary results suggest that both phases of the buccal rhythm are generated by substrates located at the same level as the previously identified Buccal area. Nevertheless, using our current methodology, we are unable to discern whether multiple substrates or a single substrate is generating the buccal rhythm. To address this question, we developed a ‘buccal slice’ preparation at the level of the Buccal area which, when exposed to 100nM AMPA, produces buccal‐like bursts. We continue to develop this preparation as it holds promise for further dissecting the properties of this system and exploring it at the cellular and molecular levels. Our analysis suggests that the Buccal area is an evolutionary homolog of the mammalian preBötzinger complex. Both are located in rhombomere 7, are resilient oscillators, being staunchly insensitive to CO 2 , and co‐opted for sniffing. We anticipate that having two comparable preparations, i.e. ‘buccal slice’ and ‘preBötC slice’, will allow for more direct comparisons between these oscillators, further testing their homology and thus take us closer towards understanding the evolution of breathing. Support or Funding Information National Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) and Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (AIHS) provided funding for this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→