MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Anatomic Intrapulmonary Arteriovenous Anastomoses And Right‐To‐Left Shunt As Evaluated By The Multiple Inert Gas Elimination Technique

2016· article· en· W4389027355 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael K. Stickland, Peter D. Wagner, Vincent Tedjasaputra, Desi P. Fuhr, Sophie É. Collins, Harrieth Wagner, Sean van Diepen, Bradley W. Byers, Susan R. Hopkins

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricleShunt (medical)PerfusionCardiac outputSalineDobutamineRight-to-left shuntCatheterArterial catheterCardiologyInternal medicineArterial bloodHemodynamicsAnesthesiaRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Previous work using agitated saline contrast echocardiography suggests anatomic intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses (IPAVAs) can be recruited during exercise, in hypoxia and when cardiac output is increased pharmacologically. These observations are in contrast to the considerable work using the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) which has not found significant right‐to‐left intrapulmonary shunt at rest or during exercise. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate anatomical intra‐pulmonary arteriovenous connections using agitated saline contrast echocardiography and 25μm microspheres and compare to right to left gas exchange shunt quantified by MIGET in the dog. Methods Dogs were anaesthetized (I.V. propofol), ventilated (5 cm H 2 O PEEP) and evaluated during the following conditions: 1) Baseline, 2) 10 μg/kg/min I.V. dobutamine, 3) 2 μg/kg/min I.V. dopamine, 4) hypoxia (FIO 2 = 0.125). Within each condition, pulmonary mixed venous blood was obtained via a Swan‐Ganz catheter, and arterial blood via indwelling femoral catheter. Ventilation‐perfusion mismatch (V A /Q.), diffusion limitation and right‐to‐left shunt was quantified by MIGET and cardiac output by direct Fick. Presence of IPAVAs was evaluated by agitated saline contrast echocardiography, as well as contrast echocardiography using 25μm microspheres. Results At baseline, no animal demonstrated a positive contrast echocardiogram suggestive of IPAVAs, and calculated right‐to‐left shunt from MIGET was 0.3±0.1% of cardiac output. Across the three experimental conditions, saline contrast bubbles were detected in the left ventricle 83% of the time, while 25μm microspheres were detected in the left ventricle by echocardiography 67% of the time. No diffusion limitation or low V A /Q. regions (i.e. V. A /Q. ratio of 0.005–0.1) were detected at any point, and right‐to‐left shunt was below 1% during dobutamine, dopamine, and hypoxia (0.6±0.3%, 0.6±0.3%, 0.8±0.6%, respectively). Conclusion Anatomic arteriovenous anastomoses of approximately 25 μm in diameter can be recruited during hypoxia and pharmacologically in the healthy intact lung; however, their functional contribution to right‐to‐left shunt or gas exchange impairment is minimal. Support or Funding Information Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207