MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A role for Sarcolemmal Membrane‐Associated Protein (SLMAP) in mediating autophagy in endothelial cells through an AMPK‐dependent mechanism

2016· article· en· W4389027495 on OpenAlexaff
Arun Prasath Lakshmanan, Samson Mathews Samuel, Chris R. Triggle, Balwant S. Tuana, Hong Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumCell biologyAutophagyUmbilical veinChemistryHuman umbilical vein endothelial cellEndothelial stem cellBiologyBiochemistryApoptosisIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Sarcolemmal membrane associated protein (SLMAP) belongs to the superfamily of tail‐anchored membrane proteins and is a component of endoplasmic reticulum (ER)/sarcoplasmic reticulum as well as mitochondria, cell surface membranes and the nuclear envelope. It has been reported to be involved in various physiological functions mainly in, for example, the regulation of ion channels, membrane fusion and vesicle transport. Previously, we have shown that the up‐regulation of SLMAP protein in diabetic db/db and Tally Ho mice was linked to endothelial dysfunction; however, until now no mechanistic evidence has been provided as to how an up‐regulation of SLMAP disrupts endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The primary objective for the current study was to elucidate the cellular pathway(s) whereby an overexpression of SLMAP in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) results in endothelial dysfunction. Materials and Methods HUVECs were cultured in M199 medium (Sigma Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 15% FBS, heparin (0.1% of 100mg/ml), ECGS (0.01% of 100 mg/ml), 100 μg/mL penicillin, and 100 U/mL streptomycin, at 37°C in a 5% CO 2 —95% air‐humidified incubator. The 41kDa isoform of SLMAP was overexpressed in HUVECs using SLMAP Lentiviral particles designed for humans (Accession number: AF304450.1; Genecopoeia), and SLMAP was partially knocked using small hairpin RNA (shRNA) lentiviral particles for humans (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Catalogue number: sc‐78464‐V). The procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions using polybrene at a concentration of 5μg/ml. After overexpression, the HUVECs were treated with, or without, the AMP‐activated protein kinase activator (AMPK), AICAR, 500μM, for 24 h. Protein markers of apoptosis, oxidative stress and autophagy were evaluated by Western Blotting, FACS, DHE staining and immunofluorescence techniques respectively. Results The ER chaperone protein, GRP78; the unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling proteins, such as IRE‐1α, PERK, XBP1s, cleaved caspase‐3, p‐JNK, Bcl‐XL; and markers of autophagy, such as LC3B‐II, Beclin‐1 were found to be significantly elevated ( p<0.05 ), while protein levels of p‐AMPKα ( Thr172 ) and SERCA2 were significantly decreased ( p<0.05 ) in HUVECs overexpressed with SLMAP. Interestingly, treatment with the AMPK activator, AICAR, significantly ( p<0.05 ) reversed all of the changes in HUVECs overexpressed with SLMAP. Moreover, the partial knock down of SLMAP significantly reduced IRE‐1α, PERK, XBP1s, p‐JNK, Bcl‐XL, LC3B‐II, Beclin‐1 proteins level, and increased p‐AMPKα ( Thr172 ) and SERCA2 proteins level in SLMAP shRNA‐transfected HUVECs. Conclusion Collectively, this study has demonstrated for the first time that changes in the expression of SLMAP protein (41kDa) play an important role in ER stress and autophagy in endothelial cells via an AMPK‐dependent mechanism. Support or Funding Information This abstract is part of the project funded by NPRP: 5‐149‐3‐040

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207