1664. The Impact of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis on Empiric Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Clinical trials have demonstrated that levofloxacin prophylaxis during periods of neutropenia in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) reduces the frequency of bacteremia in adults and febrile episodes in children. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may also have a role in reducing empiric intravenous antibiotic (EIA) use. Methods This retrospective review assessed the impact of levofloxacin prophylaxis for patients < 18 years undergoing HSCT at a Canadian children’s hospital. The primary outcome was antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) during the pre-engraftment period comparing the pre-levofloxacin era (Jan 1, 2019–Jun 30, 2020) to the levofloxacin era (Jul 1, 2020–Dec 31, 2021). Patients were excluded if they were receiving EIA at the time of transplant, received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or if levofloxacin use was discordant with their era. Secondary outcomes included the number of positive blood cultures and clinical deterioration episodes (clinical change resulting in blood culture draw and initiation/change of EIA). Results Fifty-four of 152 patients (36.5%) and 55 of 147 patients (37.4%) were included in the pre-levofloxacin and levofloxacin eras respectively. The most common reasons for exclusion were EIA use at the time of transplant and levofloxacin use discordant with the patient's era (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups (Table 1). Mean DOT/pre-engraftment days (%) were significantly lower in the levofloxacin era for piperacillin-tazobactam (53.3 vs. 38.3, p=0.004) and amikacin (1.7 vs. 0.1, p=0.03), while there was no significant difference for meropenem, vancomycin, or all other antibiotics combined. There was also no significant difference in the number of positive blood cultures (11 vs. 7, p=0.35) or clinical deterioration episodes (55 vs. 66, p=0.1). Conclusion Levofloxacin prophylaxis in children undergoing HSCT reduced percent pre-engraftment days on piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin, with no significant impact on the number of positive blood cultures or clinical deterioration episodes. Therefore, levofloxacin prophylaxis may facilitate antimicrobial stewardship activities through reduced use of certain broad-spectrum antibiotics. Disclosures Kathryn E. Timberlake, PharmD, Avir Pharma: Advisor/Consultant
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".