MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389029691 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2408

2797. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) Is Highly Effective Against Multidrug-Resistant HA- and CA- <i>S. aureus</i> Strains

2023· article· en· W4389029691 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cristina P Romo Bernal, Micah Chavez, Sheeny Levengood, Caetano P. Sabino, Nicolas Loebel

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMupirocinMedicineMicrobiologyStaphylococcus aureusAntimicrobialMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusLinezolidClindamycinAntibiotic resistanceMultiple drug resistanceDrug resistanceAntibioticsVancomycinBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is often associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections found in healthcare settings, resulting in 48,000 deaths in the US and 1.27 million deaths worldwide each year. S. aureus strains are a common component of nasal microbiota and can be disseminated by both patients and healthcare workers, posing a substantial hospital-acquired infection risk. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) combines the use of a photosensitizer (PS) with a specific wavelength of light to induce photochemical reactions lethal to a broad spectrum of microbes, without resistance induction. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of aPDT against clinically-relevant multidrug-resistant S. aureus strains using a commercially-available photosensitizer formulation (SteriwaveTM, Ondine Biomedical Inc., Vancouver, BC). Resistance profile of MRSA strains Methods The MRSA strains used in this study included confirmed resistance to: cefoxitin, clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, mupirocin, oxacillin, penicillin, rifampicin, novobiocin, tetracyclines, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, tedizolid quinupristin/dalfopristin and mupirocin. aPDT was carried out by exposing planktonic suspensions of each strain to photosensitizer formulations containing either 0.01% MB or SteriwaveTM (0.01% MB and 0.25% chlorhexidine gluconate in an aqueous excipient base). Illumination was performed at 670 nm, 150 mW/cm2 for 60 s (9 J/cm2). Samples were serially diluted and plated on TSA for CFU counting Results Relative to untreated controls, aPDT resulted in a minimum reduction of 3log10 (99.9%) against all MRSA strains tested, with the commercial SteriwaveTM formulation producing an average of 10X greater kills than aqueous methylene blue under the same illumination parameters. Conclusion aPDT is highly effective against a variety of clinically-relevant multidrug-resistant S. aureus strains in 60 s of treatment. The technique represents a promising alternative to antibiotics in healthcare systems where antimicrobial resistance strategies are important Disclosures Nicolas G. Loebel, PhD, ONDINE Biomedical Inc.: Board Member|ONDINE Biomedical Inc.: Employee|ONDINE Biomedical Inc.: Stocks/Bonds

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207