MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389029703 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1652

1823. Disproportionate Rates of COVID-19 Among Black Canadian Communities: Lessons from the First Year of the Pandemic

2023· article· en· W4389029703 on OpenAlexaffabout
Upton Allen, Michelle Barton, Julia Upton, Annette Bailey, Aaron Campigotto, Mariana Abdulnoor, Jean‐Philippe Julien, Jonathan B. Gubbay, Niranjan Kissoon, Alice Litosh, Peter Wong, Andrew R. Allen, Renee Bailey, Walter Byrne, Matthew Hwang, Chantal Phillips, Alicia Polack, Cheryl Prescod, Kimberly M. Thompson, Sylvanus Thompson, Nicole Wisener, Carl James

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsThornhill Medical (Canada)York UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenRegent Park Community Health CentreSickKids FoundationToronto Metropolitan UniversityBC Children's HospitalLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePandemicAsymptomaticDemographySerologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Logistic regressionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)EpidemiologyInternal medicineImmunologyAntibodyDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Black North American communities have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19. These data have been largely based on case counts, hospitalizations and mortality data. Serologic testing enables a more complete determination of infection burden by documenting infection in persons with symptomatic as well as asymptomatic infection. We used serologic testing to determine the extent to which SARS-CoV-2 had penetrated into the Black community. We examined risk factors associated with seropositivity, including the presence of medical comorbidities and the social determinants of health. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a COVID-19 high-prevalence zone in Ontario along with 2 areas that have lower rates of COVID-19 cases. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were determined using the EUROIMMUN assay. The study samples were collected between August 15, 2020, and December 15, 2020 prior to the deployment of COVID-19 vaccines. Proportions were compared using Fishers Exact test or chi-square; potential risk factors were examined using a multiple logistic regression approach. Results Among 387 evaluable subjects, the majority, 274 (70.8%) were enrolled from northwest Greater Toronto Area (GTA) and adjoining suburban areas of Peel, Ontario with a high proportion of Black residents. The seropositivity rates for the lower prevalence areas (Oakville and London, Ontario) were comparable (3.3% (2/60; 95% CI 0.4-11.5) and 3.9% (2/51; 95% CI 0.5-13.5), respectively). The seropositivity rate for the northwest GTA was 12.6% (26/206); RR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.8). Persons under the age of 19 years had the highest seropositivity rate (10/50; 20.0%, 95% CI 10.3-33.7%). Front-line workers were greater than 3 times more likely to be seropositive compared with non-frontline workers (13.0 vs 3.2%; p=.01; RR 3.3 (95% CI 1.3 – 8.3). There was an interaction effect between race and location of residence as this relates to the relative risk of seropositivity. Conclusion During the pre-vaccine phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the seropositivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 within a COVID-19 high-prevalence area was 3-fold greater than lower prevalence areas of Ontario, Canada. The data help to define the burden of COVID-19 within a community with a high proportion of Black residents compared with other communities. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207