MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389030210 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad500.994

1154. Impact of Vaccination Protocol Implementation and Splenectomized Patient Management in a Specialized Clinic on Incidence of Encapsulated Bacterial Infections: a Retrospective Cohort Study in Quebec, Canada

2023· article· en· W4389030210 on OpenAlexaffabout
Florence Gingras‐Lessard, Jean Berchmans Musonera, Alex Carignan

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal Trauma and Injuries
Canadian institutionsDéveloppement Economique LongueuilUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSplenectomyVaccinationIncidence (geometry)CohortMeningococcal vaccineRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsImmunologyStreptococcus pneumoniaeInternal medicineImmunizationImmune systemSpleenAntibioticsMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Splenectomy weakens immunity against encapsulated bacteria and is associated with increased overwhelming post-splenectomy infection rates. The impact of recommended vaccines for these bacterial infections has not been studied in Quebec. This study aims to i) assess changes in the incidence of encapsulated bacterial infections in patients who underwent splenectomy at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS) from 1990 to 2019; ii) Investigate any changes in vaccine coverage following the implementation of: 1) a peri-splenectomy vaccination protocol in 2005 and 2) the creation of a clinic dedicated to splenectomized patients in 2015. Methods This retrospective cohort study selected splenectomy cases performed between 1990 and 2019 at CHUS. Bacterial infections (S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and N. meningitidis) were identified from electronic files of microbiology laboratories. Temporal trends were assessed over three periods according to the years in which pneumococcal polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines were recommended (1990–1998; 1999–2012; 2013–2019). The primary outcome was occurrence of vaccine-preventable infection within 5 years of splenectomy. Results The study included 544 splenectomized patients. The proportion of patients aged ≥65 years significantly increased over time [1990–1998: 30%; 1999–2012: 39%; 2013–2019: 44%; p=0.03]. S. pneumoniae [1990–1998: 6%; 1999–2012: 3%; 2013–2019: 0%; p=0.007] and H. influenzae infections significantly decreased [1990–1998: 11%; 1999–2012: 6%; 2013–2019: 0%; p=0.007]. Vaccination protocol implementation was associated with increase in the number of adequately vaccinated patients (Hib and PPV) in the 6 months after splenectomy [pre-protocol: 21%; post-protocol: 66%; p< 0.0001]. A significant difference between vaccination coverage (Hib, VPP, and VPC) in the 6 months after the splenectomy of patients seen in the immunization clinic (49%) and those not referred (8%) was observed (p< 0.0001). Conclusion Marked decrease in post-splenectomy infection rates was observed in our population over 30 years, despite aging. Vaccination protocol implementation and splenectomized patient management in a specialized clinic can improve vaccination coverage. Disclosures Alex Carignan, MD, MSc, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Honoraria|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Honoraria|Orimed Pharma: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAbdominal Trauma and InjuriesFrench-language works237,207