MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389031270 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad500.004

88. Fostamatinib for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 Who Required Oxygen Supplementation: Results of a Phase 3 Trial

2023· article· en· W4389031270 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deepa Gotur, Anuj Malik, Vadim Markovtsov, Lucy Yan, Wolfgang Dummer, Ziad Mallat

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSykPlaceboClinical endpointInternal medicineRandomizationRandomized controlled trialTyrosine kinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Severe COVID-19 is linked to hyperactivation of the host immune response involving signaling through multiple spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) pathways. Fostamatinib is an orally administered potent and selective inhibitor of SYK that has been approved in the US, Canada, Japan, and Europe for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of fostamatinib in adults hospitalized for COVID-19 who required oxygen supplementation (NCT04629703). Patients (pts) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive fostamatinib (150 mg BID administered orally) or placebo for 14 days. All pts additionally received standard of care at their hospital. The primary endpoint was days on oxygen (days 1-29). Results A total of 280 pts underwent randomization (with 141 assigned to fostamatinib and 139 to placebo). The primary endpoint was met; those who received fostamatinib had lower mean days on oxygen than those who received placebo (4.8 vs. 7.6 days, P=0.0136; Table 1). Fostamatinib showed significance or trend towards significance in all secondary endpoints of reducing mortality and morbidity compared to placebo. The mean change in the 8-point ordinal score from baseline to the average of Day 5 to 15 was significantly improved in pts who received fostamatinib vs. placebo (P=0.0092,Table 1). Furthermore, 6 pts were enrolled with a baseline ordinal score of 6 (3 in each group). All patients in the fostamatinib group survived, and all in the placebo group died by Day 30. A significantly higher proportion of pts who received fostamatinib were discharged from the hospital by Day 15 compared to placebo (P=0.0029,Table 1). Significantly more patients were alive and oxygen-free by Day 29 and Day 60 with fostamatinib treatment in comparison to placebo (P=0.0213 and P=0.0271, respectively, Table 1). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with previous studies and were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusion The addition of fostamatinib to standard of care treatment resulted in significantly fewer days on oxygen, an improved 8-point ordinal scale score, and significantly more patients alive and oxygen-free by Day 60 compared to placebo in pts with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization and supplemental oxygen. Disclosures Deepa B. Gotur, MD, FCCP, FCCM, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Speaker at ATS|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant Vadim Markovtsov, PhD, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employee|Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Lucy Yan, MD, PhD, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employee|Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Wolfgang Dummer, MD, PhD, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207