MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389031628 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad500.283

210. Evaluating the Costs of <i>Escherichia coli</i> Bloodstream Infections: A Population-Based Cohort Study

2023· article· en· W4389031628 on OpenAlexaffabout
Teagan King, Ranjani Somayaji, Jenine Leal, Jason Black, Dan Gregson, John Conly, Elissa Rennert‐May

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and Maternal Infections
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBloodstream infectionPropensity score matchingCohortPopulationOdds ratioCohort studyInternal medicinePediatricsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a frequent cause of blood stream infection (BSI) with associated morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the costs of susceptible and resistant E. coli BSI in children and adults. There is a paucity of studies examining E. coli BSI using micro-costing data within North America. Methods Population-based cohort of all blood cultures from 2011 to 2018 in Calgary, Canada, linked to micro- and gross costing data using administrative databases. Compared no BSI to any E. coli infection, classified as resistant to any antimicrobial agent or susceptible, over 90 days. Propensity score matching was done 4:1 by age, sex, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was mean costs, using multivariable linear regression models in R version 4.1.0. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), readmissions and 90-day all-cause mortality. Comparative analyses were reported using odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs. Results A total of 37,482 children and 89,673 adults were included: 225 susceptible and 21 resistant BSI in children, and 3,870 and 711, in adults. Mean and standard deviation (SD) costs of an E. coli BSI including ED visits and hospitalizations for 90 days in children were $99,214 ($152,809) for susceptible, and $94,628 ($113,281) for resistant infections, and $36,104 ($74,274), and $57,162 ($176,019) in adults. The greatest cost difference in adults was resistant E. coli BSI compared to no BSI ($24,265, 95% CI $11,308-37,223, p&amp;lt; 0.001), with higher odds of readmission (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.26-1.88, p&amp;lt; 0.001) and increased LOS (4.17 days, 95% CI 1.04-7.30, p=0.009). In children, cost differences were greatest for susceptible infections compared to no BSI ($45,186, 95% CI 27,965-62,406, p&amp;lt; 0.001), with the longest initial hospitalization (17.1 days, 95% CI 10.3-23.9, p&amp;lt; 0.001), and higher readmissions at 90 days (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.17-2.31, p=0.004). E. coli BSI did not impact mortality for children or adults compared to those with no BSI. Conclusion E. coli BSI is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. Total cost differences were highest among adults with resistant, and children with susceptible infections compared to no BSI. Further research into cost-effectiveness of BSI diagnosis, treatment and prevention is warranted. Disclosures Ranjani Somayaji, M.D, CF Foundation: Grant/Research Support|CIHR: Grant/Research Support|Oncovir: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Fees|Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria Dan Gregson, MD, BioMerieux Canada: Advisor/Consultant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsFrench-language works237,207