Origin of evolutionary bifurcation in an enzyme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Evolution can lead to significantly distinct outcomes depending on the mutational path taken. Evolutionary bifurcation, in which two mutational trajectories segregate, becoming non-interchangeable over time, is the basis of diversification in all kingdoms of life. Here, we present a detailed molecular description of a bifurcation event that rapidly led to the emergence of two distinct enzymes from a common ancestor. When initiated from two starting points that differed by a single amino acid, the laboratory evolution of a phosphotriesterase (PTE) toward arylester hydrolysis resulted in different genetic and phenotypic outcomes. One trajectory led to a >35,000-fold increase in activity via the reorganization of its active site to achieve exquisite enzyme-substrate complementarity. The second trajectory gave rise to an evolved variant with a ∼500-fold increase in activity, but exhibiting an alternative substrate binding mode resulting from the destabilization of an active site loop. While initial mutations tend to dictate mutational accessibility, we rather observed the gradual divergence and specialisation of each trajectory, following the emergence of distinct molecular interaction networks. Intramolecular epistasis underlay pathway bifurcation by promoting unique synergistic interactions within each trajectory, while restricting the fixation of mutation across pathways. Our results illustrate how distinct molecular outcomes can radiate from a common protein ancestor and give rise to phenotypic diversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".