MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evolvability and the Diversification of the Craniofacial Skeleton in the Domesticated Pigeon ( <i>Columba livia</i> )

2016· article· en· W4389034369 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Linde‐Medina, John W. Fondon, Ralph Marcucio, Benedikt Hallgrímsson, Nathan M. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMorphological variations and asymmetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsEvolvabilityBiologyEvolutionary biologyDomesticationModularity (biology)PopulationMorphometricsTaxonNatural selectionVariation (astronomy)ZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the evolution of complex structures, like the cranium, represents a principal aim in evolutionary biology. It has been argued that the evolution of a modular organization, by which different subunits of a structure can change relatively independent from one another, has favored the morphological diversification of complex structures. However, the potential of species to diversify can be hidden in natural populations due to the fact that both natural selection and genetic drift tend to reduce phenotypic variation. This mismatch between potential and actual phenotypic variation will confound studies aimed to understand the role of integration and modularity in the evolution of complex structures. For example, a taxon with a high degree of modularity could display lower phenotypic variation than a taxon with low modularity if the former evolved under strong stabilizing selection. Domesticated species are characterized for displaying a wider spectrum of morphologies than their wild populations. Thus, domesticated species offer a unique opportunity to investigate if this increase in phenotypic diversification is related to changes in pattern and/or magnitude of morphological integration and modularity or, instead, it reflects the potential of a common structural pattern to generate phenotypic variation, i.e. the evolvability of the wild population. Here we use geometric morphometrics to quantify variation in cranium size and shape of domesticated pigeons and compare this to their feral counterparts. We show that domesticated pigeons do not represent novel phenotypes but extensions of variation already present in the feral population. We also show that the increase of variation in domesticated pigeons would mainly reflect the evolvability of the feral population. Support or Funding Information National Institutes of Health Grants R01DE019638 and R01DE021708.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicMorphological variations and asymmetryFrench-language works237,207